(February 2021) The Russian Federation has one of the largest networks of migrant detention centres in the world, including more than two dozen as of 2020. Observers have criticised conditions at these centres, called Specialised Institutions for the Temporary Detention of Foreign Citizens. Detainees have complained of being physically abused by staff at some centres, and there are reports of poor sanitary conditions, as well as a lack of food and medical personnel. Stateless persons, pregnant women, unaccompanied children, and other vulnerable individuals have been detained at these centres.
In December Russia introduced important amendments to its Code of Administrative Offences–including limiting the maximum period of detention in immigration detention facilities to 90 days, and permitting detainees the right to apply to a court to verify the legality of their detention. […]
In an effort to reach recruitment targets for its war in Ukraine, Russia has been attempting to coerce or force foreign migrants to fight. Authorities and private military companies have attempted to enlist foreigners in migration offices, workplaces, prisons, worker dormitories, and mosques. According to several reports, immigration detainees have also been targeted for enlistment. […]
In December 2020, the Russian government issued a presidential decree extending several COVID-19-related measures affecting foreigners in the country. Measures, which were extended until 15 June 2021, include the suspension of forced expulsions and deportations, as well as the suspension of cancellations of refugee status, visas, work permits, residence permits, and other documents. Certain people […]
Foreign migrant workers have been disproportionately affected by the pandemic in Russia, with large numbers losing employment amidst the economic downturn. In a survey conducted by the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration in April-May 2020, 75 percent of surveyed migrants reported having lost their jobs or being forced into unpaid leave, […]
Since issuing a moratorium on new detention orders on 18 April (Decree of the President of Russia No.2745) (see 18 April update), Russia has reportedly not issued any new detention orders. This was confirmed by the Civic Assistance Committee and Memorial in a GDP survey on 21 July. The organisations also noted that some foreign […]
On 18 April, President Putin signed a decree “On Temporary Measures to Resolve the Legal Situation of Foreign Citizens and Stateless Persons in the Russian Federation in Connection with the Threat of Further Spread of the new Coronavirus Infection Covid-19.” This new decree provides that the period from 15 March until 15 June 2020 will […]
Russia has taken some steps to limit immigration detainee populations. At the same time, it has taken draconian measures that have severely increased the vulnerability of thousands of migrant workers and other foreigners residing in the country. According to ADC Memorial, the government has prohibited the placement of new people in detention centres, and instead […]
Total Number of Children Placed in Immigration Detention (Year)
0
2017
DETENTION CAPACITY
Total Immigration Detention Capacity
0
2018
ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION
Number of Detainees Referred to ATDs (Year)
89,192
2015
ADDITIONAL ENFORCEMENT DATA
Percentage of Removals v. Total Removal Orders (Year)
0.12%
2010
PRISON DATA
Criminal Prison Population (Year)
622,079
2017
675,000
2014
Percentage of Foreign Prisoners (Year)
4.3%
2015
4.2%
2009
Prison Population Rate (per 100,000 of National Population)
430
2017
470
2014
POPULATION DATA
Population (Year)
144,400,000
2023
145,900,000
2020
146,880,432
2018
143,457,000
2015
International Migrants (Year)
11,636,911
2020
11,640,559
2019
11,651,500
2017
11,643,300
2015
11,195,000
2010
International Migrants as Percentage of Population (Year)
7.97%
2020
8.1%
2017
8.1%
2015
Refugees (Year)
1,249,342
2023
10,901
2021
20,260
2020
42,413
2019
77,397
2018
126,035
2017
228,936
2016
314,507
2015
235,750
2014
Ratio of Refugees Per 1000 Inhabitants (Year)
1.6
2016
1.64
2014
Asylum Applications (Year)
773
2023
8,094
2019
26,326
2016
274,744
2014
Refugee Recognition Rate (Year)
4.7
2014
Stateless Persons (Year)
93,802
2023
75,679
2018
82,148
2017
90,771
2016
113,474
2015
SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA & POLLS
Gross Domestic Product per Capita (in USD)
$ 12,735,000
2014
Remittances to the Country (in USD)
$ 7,115,000,000
2014
Unemployment Rate
%
2014
Human Development Index Ranking (UNDP)
50
(High)
2015
Pew Global Attitudes Poll on Immigration
72
2007
LEGAL & REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Does the Country Detain People for Migration, Asylum, or Citizenship Reasons?
Yes
2023
Does the Country Have Specific Laws that Provide for Migration-Related Detention?
Yes
2023
Detention-Related Legislation
Name
Year Adopted
Last Amended
Federal Law on Citizenship
2023
Law on Refugees (as amended by Federal Law of June 28, 1997 N 95-FZ) (as amended on July 31, 2020), (О беженцах (в редакции Федерального закона от 28 июня 1997 года N 95-ФЗ) (с изменениями на 31 июля 2020 года)
1997
2020
Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences of 30 December 2001 N°195-FZ (as amended on July 31, 2020) (as amended and supplemented, entered into force on August 11, 2020), ("Кодекс Российской Федерации об административных правонарушениях" от 30.12.2001 N 195-ФЗ (ред. от 31.07.2020) (с изм. и доп., вступ. в силу с 11.08.2020))
2001
2020
Law on the Legal Status of Foreign Citizens in the Russian Federation (О Правовом Положении Иностранных Граждан В Российской Федерации)
2002
Law of the Russian Federation On the State Border of the Russian Federation (Закон РФ "О Государственной границе Российской Федерации" от 01.04.1993 N 4730-1)
1993
2007
Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 12/30/2013 N 1306 (as amended on 06/17/2016) on the approval of the Rules for keeping (stay) in special institutions of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation or its territorial body of foreign citizens and stateless persons subject to administrative expulsion from the Russian Federation in the form of forced expulsion from the Russian Federation, deportation or readmission (Постановление Правительства РФ от 30.12.2013 N 1306 (ред. от 17.06.2016) Об утверждении Правил содержания (пребывания) в специальных учреждениях Министерства внутренних дел Российской Федерации или его территориального органа иностранных граждан и лиц без гражданства, подлежащих административному выдворению за пределы Российской Федерации в форме принудительного выдворения за пределы Российской Федерации, депортации или реадмиссии)
2012
2016
Do Migration Detainees Have Constitutional Guarantees?
Yes/No
Constitution and articles
Adopted in
Last amendend
Yes
The Constitution of the Russian Federation, Article 22(2)
1993
Additional Legislation
Name
Year Adopted
Last Amended
Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation, No. 195-FZ of 30 December 2001
2001
2012
Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, No. 138-FZ of 14 November 2002
2002
2012
The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, No. 63-FZ of 13 June 1996
1996
2012
Bilateral/Multilateral Readmission Agreements
Name
Year in force
Austria
2005
Austria
2011
Belgium
2010
Bulgaria
2012
Cyprus
2011
Czech Republic
2012
Denmark
2011
Estonia
2011
Germany
2012
Finland
2013
France
2010
Greece
2004
Hungary
2011
Italy
2011
Latvia
2009
Lithuania
2003
Lithuania
2012
Luxembourg
2013
Malta
2011
Poland
1961
Poland
2013
Portugal
2013
Romania
2012
Slovakia
2010
Slovenia
2012
Spain
2011
Sweden
2012
Netherlands
2011
Norway
2012
Switzerland
2011
Armenia
2011
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2016
Belarus
2014
Moldova
2011
Serbia
2015
Ukraine
2013
Turkey
2011
Kazakhstan
2015
Kyrgyzstan
2013
Mongolia
2014
Uzbekistan
2014
Viet Nam
2009
EU
2007
Expedited/Fast Track Removal
Yes
2016
Re-Entry Ban
Yes
2016
Legal Tradition(s)
Civil law
2016
Federal or Centralised Governing System
Federal system
2016
Centralised or Decentralised Immigration Authority
Centralized immigration authority
2016
GROUNDS FOR DETENTION
Immigration-Status-Related Grounds
Detention for unauthorised entry or stay
2015
Criminal Penalties for Immigration-Related Violations
Fines
Incarceration
Year
Yes
Yes
1996
Grounds for Criminal Immigration-Related Incarceration / Maximum Length of Incarceration
Grounds for Incarceration
Maximum n. of Days
Year
Unauthorized entry
730
1996
Unauthorized exit
730
1996
Has the Country Decriminalised Immigration-Related Violations?
No
1996
Children & Other Vulnerable Groups
Group
In Law
In Practice
Year
Accompanied minors
Provided
Yes
2018
Unaccompanied minors
Provided
Yes
2018
Stateless persons
Provided
Yes
2018
Persons with disabilities
Not mentioned
Yes
2018
Asylum seekers
Prohibited
Yes
2018
Stateless persons
Yes
2015
Accompanied minors
Provided
2015
Asylum seekers
Prohibited
Yes
2013
Mandatory Detention
Detention
For
Year
Yes
Non-citizens who have violated a re-entry ban
2016
Yes
2016
Yes
2016
LENGTH OF DETENTION
Maximum Length of Administrative Immigration Detention
720
2018
DETENTION INSTITUTIONS
Custodial Authorities
Agency
Ministry
Typology
Year
The General Administration for Migration Issues
The Ministry of Internal Affairs
Internal or Public Security
2018
Federal Migration Service
Immigration or Citizenship
2016
Federal Migration Service
Immigration or Citizenship
2013
Ministry for Internal Affairs
Interior or Home Affairs
2013
Police
Internal or Public Security
2013
Federal Migration Service
2008
Federal Migration Service
2008
Apprehending Authorities
Name
Agency
Ministry
Year
Police
Police
2018
Federal Security Service (FSB)
Law enforcement, border control and national security
2018
Detention Facility Management
Entity
Type
Year
Police (The Administration for Migration Issues of the Ministry of Internal Affairs)
Governmental
2018
Federal Migration Service
Governmental
2015
Federal Migration Service
Governmental
2013
Ministry for Internal Affairs
Governmental
2013
Police
Governmental
2013
Formally Designated Detention Estate?
Designated
Type
Year
Yes
Dedicated immigration detention facilities
2018
Yes
Any facility designated by relevant authority
2018
PROCEDURAL STANDARDS & SAFEGUARDS
Procedural Standards
Name
In Law
In Practice
Year
Independent review of detention
No
2016
Right to legal counsel
No
2016
COSTS & OUTSOURCING
COVID-19 DATA
TRANSPARENCY
MONITORING
Types of Authorised Detention Monitoring Institutions
Institution
Type
Year
Public Monitoring Commission (Regional)
International or Regional Bodies (IRBs)
2018
High Commissioner on Human Rights in the Russian Federation (Уполномоченный по правам человека в РФ)
National Human Rights Institution (or Ombudsperson) (NHRI)
2016
European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT)
International or Regional Bodies (IRBs)
2012
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS MONITORING BODIES
NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISMS (OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO UN CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE)
NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS (NGOS)
GOVERNMENTAL MONITORING BODIES
INTERNATIONAL DETENTION MONITORING
International Monitoring Bodies that Carry Out Detention Monitoring Visits
Monitoring body
Frequency
INTERNATIONAL TREATIES & TREATY BODIES
International Treaties Ratified
Ratification Year
Observation Date
CRPD, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
2012
2012
CTOCTP, Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children
2004
2004
CTOCSP, Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime
2004
2004
CRSR, Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees
1993
1993
PCRSR, Protocol to the Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees
1993
1993
CRC, Convention on the Rights of the Child
1990
1990
VCCR, Vienna Convention on Consular Relations
1989
1989
CAT, Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
1987
1987
CEDAW, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
1981
1981
ICCPR, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
1973
1973
ICESCR, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
1973
1973
ICERD, International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
1969
1969
Ratio of relevant international treaties ratified
Ratio: 13/19
Individual Complaints Procedures
Acceptance Year
ICERD, declaration under article 14 of the Convention
1991
1991
ICCPR, First Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966
1991
1991
CEDAW, Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, 1999
2004
2004
CAT, declaration under article 22 of the Convention
1991
1991
Ratio of Complaints Procedures Accepted
Observation Date
4/7
2017
Relevant Recommendations or Observations Issued by Treaty Bodies
Recommendation Year
Observation Date
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
Recommendation;
34. Recalling its previous concluding observations and its general recommendation No. 30 (2004) on discrimination against non-citizens, the Committee recommends that the State party:
(c) Review its legal and policy framework with a view to ending the arbitrary detention of stateless persons and migrants who are undocumented or in an irregular situation under the administrative procedure, while ensuring the provision of legal aid and remedies to victims.
2023
2023
2024
Committee on the Rights of the Child
Asylum-seeking and refugee children
41. The Committee recommends that the State party:
(a) Expedite the adoption of the new Law “On granting asylum on the
territory of the Russian Federation,” and ensure access to fair and efficient asylum
procedures and documentation of children, including unaccompanied and separated
children, and that the best interests of the child are a primary consideration in all
decisions throughout the asylum procedures;
(b) Uphold and respect the international principle of non-refoulement, thus
guaranteeing that asylum-seeking and refugee children are not affected by the orders
of return of their parents to countries where their freedom or lives would be threatened;
(c) Ensure that the regulations implementing the Federal Law No 4528-1
from 19.02.1993 on “Refugees” are in line with Articles 9, 22 and 37 of the Convention,
and the Committee’s General Comment No. 6 by, inter alia, preventing the detention of
asylum-seeking children and their families.
2024
2024
2024
Human Rights Committee
22. The Committee is concerned about various problems concerning the asylum
procedure in the State party, including the risks of penalization, detention and refoulement
faced by asylum-seekers; the limited reception conditions, with no designated procedures for
persons with specific needs; the low rate of recognition of non-Ukrainian asylum-seekers;
and difficulties in integration faced by persons who have been granted temporary asylum and
recognized refugees. The Committee is also concerned that a federal bill on the granting of
asylum in the territory of the Russian Federation is still pending adoption. The Committee is
further concerned about the application of Decree No. 330 with regard to Ukrainian orphans
and other Ukrainian children without parental care (arts. 6–7, 13 and 24).
23. The State party should:
(a) Expedite the adoption of the bill on the granting of asylum in the territory
of the Russian Federation, taking into consideration comments from the Office of the
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees with respect to ensuring compliance
with the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and other international
standards;
(b) Guarantee that access to formal procedures for asylum applications is
available at all border points;
(c) Ensure that Decree No. 330 is applied in accordance with international
standards.
2022
2022
2022
Committee on the Rights of the Child
§ 62. "The Committee recommends that the State party amend the Federal Refugees Act to comply with the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and ensure that it does not impose additional criteria for be ing accepted as a refugee in the country. It also urges the State party to establish safeguards against the refoulement of children where there are substantial grounds for believing that their life or freedoms would be in danger and establish child - and gender - sensitive procedures for unaccompanied and separated children."
2014
2014
Committee against Torture
42.The Committee is concerned at reports of extraditions and expulsions of foreign persons carried out by the State party to countries where they may be at risk of torture and other ill-treatment. The Committee is especially concerned about information that persons who may be in need of international protection, particularly those held in pre-removal detention centres, including torture victims, do not have adequate access to asylum procedures and that immigration authorities often fail to register and interview asylum seekers, thereby increasing their risk of refoulement. It regrets the absence of statistical information on extradition requests granted, appeals against such decisions and outcomes thereof (art. 3).
2018
2018
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women
43.The Committee is concerned about the situation of undocumented migrant women, especially pregnant women and women with small children, in detention centres.
2015
2015
Committee on Migrant Workers
37.The Committee is concerned about reports that Tajik migrant workers and members of their families suffer from discriminatory attitudes and are often targets of hate crimes and xenophobic assaults in the main countries of employment, in particular in the Russian Federation. The Committee is particularly concerned about reports confirming that Tajik migrant workers are frequently subjected to violence, abuse, threats and intimidation by employers, public officials and private individuals in countries of employment. Those who are in an irregular situation are often held in detention centres in prison like conditions for several months or, in the absence of identity documents, for up to one year.
2012
2012
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
13. Taking into consideration the dialogue held with the Russian delegation, the Committee notes with concern reports about searches ofGeorgian businesses, police demands for lists of names ofGeorgian students, identity checks, destruction of identity papers, detention in inhumane conditions, deportations under a simplified procedure and other repressive measures against Georgian nationalsand ethnic Georgians in 2006 (arts. 2, para. 1 (a), 5 (b)and 5 (d) (i)). The Committee recommends that the State party undertake a thorough investigation, through an independent body, into all allegations of unlawful police conduct against Georgian nationals and ethnic Georgians in 2006 and adopt measures to prevent the recurrence of such acts in the future.
2008
2008
> UN Special Procedures
> UN Universal Periodic Review
Relevant Recommendations or Observations from the UN Universal Periodic Review
Observation Date
No
2023
4th
2023
No
2009
2017
No
2013
2017
> Global Compact for Migration (GCM)
GCM Resolution Endorsement
Observation Date
2018
> Global Compact on Refugees (GCR)
GCR Resolution Endorsement
Observation Date
2018
REGIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS MECHANISMS
Regional Legal Instruments
Year of Ratification (Treaty) / Transposed (Directive) / Adoption (Regulation)
Observation Date
CPCSE, Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse
2013
2013
2017
ECHRP1, Protocol 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights (amended by protocol 11)
1998
1998
2017
ECHRP7, Protocol 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights (amended by protocol 11)
1998
1998
2017
ECPT, European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment
1998
1998
2017
ECHR, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (commonly known as the European Convention on Human Rights
1998
1998
2017
HEALTH CARE PROVISION
HEALTH IMPACTS
COVID-19
Country Updates
In December 2020, the Russian government issued a presidential decree extending several COVID-19-related measures affecting foreigners in the country. Measures, which were extended until 15 June 2021, include the suspension of forced expulsions and deportations, as well as the suspension of cancellations of refugee status, visas, work permits, residence permits, and other documents. Certain people are exempt from these measures, including those who disturb public order and security (including people who participate in non-sanctioned rallies and meetings, and those who support extremist activities). Reports suggest that “public danger” and extremism can be broadly interpreted in Russia, leaving large numbers of people vulnerable to deportation despite the COVID-19 measures. In mid-February 2021, 118 people were being held in the Saint Petersburg Detention Centre, awaiting removal.
After 90 days from the date of this decree, the above-mentioned suspensions will also not apply to people from states that, as of 15 December, have reopened traffic links with Russia. As a result, observers predict an increase in expulsions from 15 March onwards.
Russia has reportedly used immigration detention centres to confine people who are not migrants or asylum seekers - including Russian citizens protesting the treatment of Alexei Navalny. With so many protesters in custody, authorities could not find sufficient places within Moscow prisons. Thus, many were placed in immigration detention centres (Centers for the Temporary Detention of Foreign Nationals). At least two facilities appear to have been used for this purpose: the Sakharovo Centre (southern Moscow suburbs), and the facility in Yegoryevsk (to the south-east of Moscow).
Footage from inside the Sakharovo facility, coupled with recent detainee testimonies, have renewed concerns about conditions inside Russia's immigration detention system and have prompted debates regarding migrants rights in the country. One detainee, the editor-in-chief of the independent news outlet Mediazona, described conditions in the centre as “hellish.”
Detainees were confined in rooms with iron beds but no mattresses; there were complaints about inadequate food provisions and drinking water; rooms appeared to be dirty and rarely cleaned; and cells were reportedly excessively hot in the day and cold at night.
A particularly contentious issue were sanitary facilities, with detainees forced to use squat toilets separated from their living area by a small, waist-high wall. Campaigners have for many years called on Russian authorities to remove squat toilets from detention facilities and ensure proper privacy is provided, and while most Moscow remand facilities are now equipped with adequate toilet stalls, updates to toilets do not appear to have been made in migrant facilities.
After detainees protested the poor detention conditions--and at least one detainee reportedly went on a hunger strike--conditions have reportedly improved, with detainees provided with mattresses, improved food supplies, and some hygiene items. Discussing the conditions in the centres, Sergey Abashin (Professor of Anthropology at the European University at Saint Petersburg) argued that many of the practices first used on migrants are soon often carried over to Russian citizens. “It's all very simple: there can be no human rights and the rule of law of even a single group is taken out, first with common consent, outside of these rights and laws, sooner or later these exceptions are extended to everyone else.”
Foreign migrant workers have been disproportionately affected by the pandemic in Russia, with large numbers losing employment amidst the economic downturn. In a survey conducted by the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration in April-May 2020, 75 percent of surveyed migrants reported having lost their jobs or being forced into unpaid leave, while 50 percent reported that they had lost all sources of income.
Citing these statistics at a meeting in August, the Deputy Head of the Security Council Dmitry Medvedev stated that high unemployment rates amongst migrant workers “creates a very fertile environment for the growth of crime potentially in this area.” Medvedev suggested that Russia implement changes to its immigration system that would make it harder for migrants to gain work permits. In particular, he proposed imitating the Kafala system (a visa-sponsorship system), which is widely used across the Gulf. “In the Arab world, there are appropriate solutions where the employer is fully responsible for the actions of a foreign citizen whom he hired to work,” he said. “This is a tough measure, but nevertheless it should probably be discussed.” Many UN experts and independent observers, however, have heavily criticized the Kafala system for leading to widespread rights abuses because it leaves migrant workers vulnerable to abuse by employers as well as to arrest, detention, and deportation.
For some Russian officials, however, Covid-related declines in the number of migrant workers (due in part to people returning to their home countries) are creating growing concerns about labour shortages. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin, for example, has warned that the city’s labour market would inevitably be affected. Noting that as of October 2020 the number of foreign migrants in the city had dropped by 40 percent this year, he said, “This affects the labor market, especially those positions that are temporarily occupied, such as snow removal. This is manual labor: shovel, broom, scrap. Not all Muscovites are ready to work in such jobs.” According to Sobyanin, these jobs will be filled by residents of other Russian regions.
Despite issuing a moratorium on new detention orders in April (see 18 April update on this platform), media reports indicate that authorities have continued to raid areas where migrant workers are known to congregate. According to Human Rights Watch (HRW), in the first two weeks of August authorities initiated a series of raids, round-ups, and detentions of migrant workers near the Tyoply Stan market in Moscow. Reportedly, the raids largely targeted Tajik migrant workers, in retaliation for a 1 August incident in which Tajik workers dragged a Tajik migrant from a police car following his arrest. According to HRW’s sources, “hundreds” were detained during these raids. Raids were also conducted in Saint Petersburg in October, with officers conducting house searches in districts including Kirovsky and Krasnogvardeisky.
Since issuing a moratorium on new detention orders on 18 April (Decree of the President of Russia No.2745) (see 18 April update), Russia has reportedly not issued any new detention orders. This was confirmed by the Civic Assistance Committee and Memorial in a GDP survey on 21 July. The organisations also noted that some foreign nationals awaiting deportation have been released – including 125 people who were released following successful petitions by the two organisations. Of the 253 cases presented by the organisations, those who were granted release were foreign nationals and stateless persons who were able to stay with Russian citizens or who owned property in the country. (Despite important legal rulings such as that of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Kim v Russia (2014), which called on Russia to take steps to protect stateless persons against detention, Russia continues to detain this vulnerable population. Once released, they are not issued documents that allow them to legally reside in Russia, leaving them vulnerable to re-detention.)
The Civic Assistance Committee and Memorial also note that deportations to countries such as Uzbekistan and Tajikistan—both important migrant-sending countries—have been temporarily halted.
Russia has long been home to large numbers of migrant workers—with a significant proportion hailing from Central Asia. Earning considerably less than Russian citizens, many are forced to live in overcrowded dormitories, which police have locked down if just one resident contracts the virus. During the pandemic, some 40 percent are reported to have permanently lost their jobs, leaving them reliant upon NGO and embassy assistance. With flights suspended, many have been forced to wait in airports or queue outside their embassies in the hope of a charter flight back to their country of origin. According to the New York Times, prior to the pandemic more than 15 flights left each day to various cities in Uzbekistan, but as of 15 June there were only two charter flights a week and the Uzbek embassy’s waiting list included more than 80,000 names.
On 18 April, President Putin signed a decree “On Temporary Measures to Resolve the Legal Situation of Foreign Citizens and Stateless Persons in the Russian Federation in Connection with the Threat of Further Spread of the new Coronavirus Infection Covid-19.” This new decree provides that the period from 15 March until 15 June 2020 will not be included in the period of temporary stay or temporary residence in Russia for foreign nationals and stateless persons, or in their registration period if it expires. This also applies to the time limit set for foreign nationals and stateless persons to leave Russia voluntarily if they are subject to administrative expulsion, deportation, or extradition. Further, no decisions will be made during this window regarding the undesirability of foreign citizens’ and stateless persons’ stay (residence), administrative expulsion, deportation or extradition to a foreign state in accordance with international readmission agreements, deprivation of refugee status, temporary asylum, work permits, and temporary residence permits. The decree also provides that during this time period, employers may hire foreign citizens and stateless persons who do not have permission to work in the country.
While authorities have ceased the detention of foreigners and stateless persons, many immigration detention facilities remain overcrowded. With no flights and no expulsions, detainees are forced to remain confined in facilities that lack appropriate health care provision and poor sanitation. As Human Rights Watch noted in a statement issued on 16 April, an estimated 8,000 people - including families with children - are effectively being held in indefinite detention. “Russian authorities should provide safe and dignified alternatives to migration detention for people facing deportation or court-mandated expulsion. They should also improve access to healthcare and ensure social distancing and other measures to prevent the spread of Covid-19 in Russia’s migration detention centers.”
Russia has taken some steps to limit immigration detainee populations. At the same time, it has taken draconian measures that have severely increased the vulnerability of thousands of migrant workers and other foreigners residing in the country.
According to ADC Memorial, the government has prohibited the placement of new people in detention centres, and instead only imposes fines for violations of migration laws. It has also permitted people to prolong their documents/permission to stay in the country. In an email to the Global Detention Project, the NGO reported that there is still severe overcrowding in some facilities, including in particular the St.Petersburg detention centre, where “people sleep on the floor on mattresses or live in the corridor on beds.” They say that the facility has reportedly sought to negotiate with the court to investigate ways to possibly reduce the population.
On 29 March 2020, human rights activists called on authorities to release migrants from the country’s detention centres. The Civic Assistance Committee published a joint letter in which they urged the state to release detainees. With no available flights, those in detention face an uncertain wait, with no date in sight for their release. On 31 March, the Sverdlovsk Regional Court overturned the expulsion of an Azerbaijani citizen, and found that the individual could no longer be detained in a SUVSIG due to the inability to deport. The judge stated: “Detention for an indefinite period of time is unacceptable, as this may become a form of punishment that is not provided for by the provisions of the legislation of the Russian Federation and which is incompatible with the provisions of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.”
When international attention was first alerted to the crisis unfolding in Wuhan, Moscow authorities not only temporarily barred many categories of Chinese nationals from entering the country, but also initiated raids on homes, hotels, businesses, and public transport in an effort to track down Chinese nationals and enforce quarantine measures. Those found to be violating such measures were issued expulsion orders or fined heavily. According to one Novaya Gazeta report, authorities went so far as to make phone calls to Chinese nationals ordering them to leave quarantine in order to attend medical tests or visa appointments, only to apprehend them and issue fines. On 29 February, some 80 Chinese nationals were reported to be facing deportation for violating quarantine measures.
Hundreds or even thousands of migrant workers have been stranded in airport transit zones in airports across Russia after the country cancelled flights to many of their home countries, including in particular those from Central Asia. On 1 April, Moscow Times reported that 300 Central Asian migrants were evicted from Moscow’s Domodedovo Airport overnight, having been stranded in the airport for weeks. Reportedly, they had been provided with some basic supplies while in the airport, but after this, as one Tajik migrant explained, “we were simply kicked out on the street at night in the cold.”
Did the country release immigration detainees as a result of the pandemic?
Yes
2020
Did the country use legal "alternatives to detention" as part of pandemic detention releases?
No
2020
Did the country Temporarily Cease or Restrict Issuing Detention Orders?
Yes
2020
Did the Country Adopt These Pandemic-Related Measures for People in Immigration Detention?
Unknown
(Unknown)
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
2021
Did the Country Lock-Down Previously "Open" Reception Facilities, Shelters, Refugee Camps, or Other Forms of Accommodation for Migrant Workers or Other Non-Citizens?
Unknown
2021
Were cases of COVID-19 reported in immigration detention facilities or any other places used for immigration detention purposes?
Unknown
2021
Did the Country Cease or Restrict Deportations/Removals During any Period After the Onset of the Pandemic?
Yes
2020
Did the Country Release People from Criminal Prisons During the Pandemic?
No
2020
Did Officials Blame Migrants, Asylum Seekers, or Refugees for the Spread of COVID-19?
Unknown
2021
Did the Country Restrict Access to Asylum Procedures?
Unknown
2021
Did the Country Commence a National Vaccination Campaign?
Yes
2021
Were Populations of Concern Included/Excluded From the National Vaccination Campaign?