Ireland

Detains migrants or asylum seekers?

Infrequently

Has laws regulating migration-related detention?

Yes

Migration Detainee Entries

490

2019

Apprehensions of Non-Citizens

1,485

2023

Refugees

99,048

2023

Asylum Applications

17,487

2023

Overview

Compared to other EU countries, Ireland detains few migrants. The country has nonetheless faced widespread criticism for its use of prisons and police stations to detain non-nationals. In 2021, the government announced that it had completed the construction a new block in Cloverhill Remand Prison to accommodate persons detained for immigration purposes. However, the block was largely used to isolate prisoners with Covid-19, and migrants continued to be detained within the prison population. After years of delays, in 2022 the country opened its first dedicated immigration detention centre at Dublin Airport Garda Station.

Types of facilities used for migration-related detention
Administrative Ad Hoc Criminal Unknown

Ireland: Growing Crackdown on Immigration and Asylum

Facing increasing pressures on its shared border with Northern Ireland and sharply rising asylum requests, Ireland has ramped up border controls and deportations. Growing Crackdown on Immigration in Ireland and Northern Ireland Recent reports reveal increasing immigration restrictions in Ireland, following a spike in irregular arrivals from the UK via Northern Ireland. According to the […]

Read More…

Screenshot of a BBC report on Ireland's immigration response, 24.11.24 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx24x47qp8no)

Ireland: Covid-19 and Detention

In late November, the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture released a report about its monitoring visit to Ireland in 2019. In the report, the committee reiterates its long-standing calls for Irish authorities to cease the use of prisons for immigration detention, noting that “a prison is by definition not a suitable place in […]

Read More…

Dublin Live, “Coronavirus Ireland: Covid-19 Outbreak Fear at Dublin Prison as New Prisoner Struck with Virus,” 12 September 2020, https://www.dublinlive.ie/news/dublin-news/coronavirus-ireland-dublin-prison-case-18924231

Ireland: Covid-19 and Detention

In an email exchange with the Global Detention Project, UNHCR Ireland reported that to their knowledge, deportations and removals had been suspended in light of the Covid-19 crisis. The International Protection Office was still functioning throughout the pandemic and applications were being accepted. However, the number of new applicants had decreased because of fewer arrivals. […]

Read More…

Skellig Star residents, Locked Inside the Centre During Quarantine, (CNN,

Ireland: Covid-19 and Detention

The Ombudsman’s Annual Report on Direct Provision asylum centres, published on 23 April, says that the Covid-19 crisis has underscored how “unsuitable and unsustainable” the physical constraints at these centres are, in particular because of the lack of overall space in the facilities and their lack of resources. The standards provide “a minimum space of […]

Read More…

A Resident of the Skellig Star Direct Provision Centre in Cahersiveen Taking a Picture of the Front Window of the Hotel, (Alan Landers,

Ireland: Covid-19 and Detention

A hotel that was converted to a “direct provision” asylum reception site in the town of Cahersiveen has been placed under lockdown after several residents tested positive for Covid-19. More than one hundred asylum seekers were transferred four weeks ago to the hotel to await the outcomes of their asylum procedures. All the residents have […]

Read More…

Ireland: Covid-19 and Detention

The Irish Department of Justice and Equality announced that all immigration permits due to expire between 20.03.2020 and 20.05.2020 are to be automatically renewed for a period of two months. In addition, the Department of Employment Affairs and Social Protection introduced a Covid-19 Pandemic Unemployment Payment, accessible to all workers irrespective of legal status. The […]

Read More…

Ireland: Covid-19 and Detention

Ireland does not have specialized immigraiotn detention centres, instead using prisons and jails to detain people for immigration reasons. In Irish prisons, the prison administration announced on 13 March 2020 restrictions regarding visits. Visits are only allowed for 15 minutes, once a week and per prisoner. Visitors under the age of 18 and those that […]

Read More…

Derick Hudson, Mountjoy Prison Fence and Wall in Dublin, Shutterstock, (https://www.thejournal.ie/prisons-ireland-coronavirus-5046229-Mar2020/)

Immigration detention In Ireland (from report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture 2019 visit to Ireland)

Immigration detention (Read full CPT report) 24. In the course of its previous visits to Ireland, the CPT has reiterated that a prison is bydefinition not a suitable place in which to detain someone who is neither suspected nor convicted ofa criminal offence. In those cases where it is deemed necessary to deprive persons of […]

Read More…

Last updated: August 2019

Ireland Immigration Detention Profile

 

 

Key Findings

  • Ireland uses prisons to confine immigration detainees, which has been repeatedly criticised by rights watchdogs both at home and abroad, who have urged the country to establish specialised detention facilities.
  • A dedicated detention centre initially slated to open at Dublin Airport in 2016/2017 will reportedly open in 2019.
  • Non-citizens confined at a Dublin Airport transit facility lack access to legal safeguards and guarantees, including lawyers, medical assistance, and detention reviews. 
  • An immigration officer or a Garda Síochána (police officer) can detain an asylum seeker and other non-citizens without a warrant.
  • Asylum seekers can be repeatedly detained under orders of a District Judge for 21-day “committals,” making them potentially vulnerable to indefinite detention.
  • Asylum seekers are often housed in “Direct Provision” reception centres, which some observers have argued operate as de facto detention facilities because of their limits upon freedom of movement.
  • When age assessments fail to establish the exact age of a young person, immigration officials reportedly generally presume that the person is over 18 and can be placed in custodial settings intended for adults.

 

INTRODUCTION

Ireland detains among the fewest numbers of migrants and asylum seekers in the European Union (EU), approximately 400 individuals annually (and 11 on any given day), most of whom are detained for very brief periods of time.[1] However, because Ireland uses prisons and police (Garda) stations for immigration purposes, it has come under repeated pressure to build dedicated immigration detention facilities,[2] a move that some observers think could lead to more detention in the country.[3]

Among the consistent critics of Ireland’s failure to open a specialised immigration centre has been the European Committee on the Prevention of Torture (CPT).[4] After its most recent visit to the country (in 2014), the committee admonished Ireland, saying: “A prison is by definition not a suitable place in which to detain someone who is neither suspected nor convicted of a criminal offence.”[5] (The CPT has a planned visit to Ireland in 2019.[6])

The issue of immigration detention gained widespread public attention in 2017 after a former au pair from Brazil who had returned to Ireland to visit friends was detained at the Dochas all-female prison under suspicion of attempting to enter the country to work illegally.[7] The incident spurred public protest as well as censure from the Brazilian Embassy, which expressed concern over how people refused entry into Ireland could be sent to “common prisons.”[8] The Irish Times, in a follow up story titled “421 people committed to prison in 2016 on immigration-related issues,”[9] reported that the use of prisons had also received criticism from the UN Committee against Torture, which provided recommendations to Ireland on this issue in both 2011 and 2017.[10]

Ireland has responded to the criticism by repeatedly stating that it intends to open an immigration detention centre at Dublin Airport. Despite initially announcing that it would open a facility by 2016, in 2017 the government revised its projections, stating that construction would not be completed until July 2018.[11] Nearly a year later however, the Minister for Justice and Equality stated that work would not be completed until the end of 2018.[12] According to the Irish Refugee Council (IRC), however, as of early 2019 the Dublin Airport facility had still not opened.[13]

Press reports from mid-June 2019 indicated that the facility—built at a cost of 3.6 million EUR and located on the premises of an unused building called Transaer House—would not be open until late 2019.[14] According to one report, there have been delays in opening the facility due to disagreements over its dual use as a Garda station and a detention facility. The centre is reportedly intended to be used to confine persons deemed inadmissible upon arrival to the country and will have holding “pens” for up to 15 persons sitting and 30 standing.[15]

In November 2017, Ireland's Minister of Justice and Equality announced that the country would opt-in to the EU Recast Reception Conditions Directive to comply with a May 2017 Supreme Court ruling, which ruled against the country's prohibition on asylum seekers accessing employment.[16] In July 2018, Ireland adopted the European Communities (Reception Conditions) Regulations to transpose the Directive into its domestic law, following the decision to opt-in.[17] The directive requires the state to provide a specialised detention facility for detained protection applicants, amongst other measures.[18] This implies that Ireland is no longer permitted to detain asylum applicants in penal facilities, which could spur changes in Irish immigration legislation.[19]

 

2. LAWS, POLICIES, PRACTICES

2.1 Key norms. Ireland’s principal immigration norms are provided in the 1946 Aliens Act, the 1999 Immigration Act, the 2000 Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act, the 2003 Immigration Act, the 2004 Immigration Act, and the 2015 International Protection Act, as well as subsequent amendments and regulations.

A new Immigration, Residence, and Protection Bill, intended to replace all previous legislation on immigration, was introduced in 2010.[20] The legislation was designed to establish a more unified immigration code, with its primary focus being the improvement of efficiency and transparency within the system.[21] However, the bill was left “in limbo, waiting to be re-drafted” after part of it was used to create the International Protection Act 2015, which was signed into law in January 2016 and came into force on 31 December 2016.[22]

The International Protection Act 2015 reformed asylum law in Ireland. The act “streamlines procedures, creating a single application process for all applicants of international protection aimed at speeding up waiting times and reducing time spent in the Direct Provision system of reception.” However, the restrictive measures provided in the act, including provisions on detention and restricting family reunification,[23] led observers to characterise the law as a “step backwards for Ireland in both its support for refugees and in its standing in the international community.”[24] 

In July 2018, Ireland adopted the European Communities (Reception Conditions) Regulations to transpose the EU Recast Reception Conditions Directive into its domestic law, following the decision to opt-in.[25] The directive requires the state to provide a specialised detention facility for detained protection applicants, amongst other measures.[26] This implies that Ireland is no longer permitted to detain asylum applicants in penal facilities, which could spur changes in Irish immigration legislation.[27]

2.2 Grounds for detention. Irish law provides various grounds for the detention of both asylum seekers (see section 2.4 Asylum seekers) and unauthorised migrants, including for those refused entry to the country and those in removal proceedings.[28] Three broad categories for immigration detention exist: detention following refusal of permission to land, detention pending deportation, and detention of asylum seekers.[29]

Detention following refusal of permission to land is regulated by the 2003 Immigration Act. Section 5.2 provides that an immigration officer or Garda Síochána (police officer) can detain anyone aged 18 or over who has been refused entry to the country or who is suspected of being “unlawfully in the State for a continuous period of less than 3 months.”[30] The Irish government, in a 2013 response to questions raised by the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD), stated that “in practice, persons refused leave to land are held for very short periods (in most cases overnight). There is a requirement in law to remove such persons as soon as practicable.”[31]

Detention pending deportation is regulated by the 1999 Immigration Act.

Ireland and the United Kingdom are the only EU countries that do not implement the EU Returns Directive. However, the grounds for pre-removal detention in Ireland broadly reflect the directive. Section 3.1 of the 1999 Immigration Act provides for removal and indefinite exclusion, as well as detention in order to carry out a removal order. According to Section 5.1 of the 1999 law, “where an immigration officer or a member of the Garda Síochána, with reasonable cause, suspects that a person against whom a deportation order is in force has failed to comply with any provision of the order or with a requirement in a notice under section 3(3)(b)(ii), he or she may arrest him or her without warrant and detain him or her in a prescribed place.”[32]

Section 5.1 of the 1999 Act further specifies that authorities can arrest, and detain without warrant, a person who has been issued a removal order and has: (1) failed to comply with any provision of the order; (2) can reasonably be suspected of trying to leave the country and enter another without legal authorisation; (3) has destroyed identity documents or is in possession of false documents; or (4) intends to avoid removal.[33] With the amendment of Section 5.1 of the 1999 Immigration Act introduced by Section 78 of the 2015 International Protection Act, an additional ground for detention was included: (5) not leaving the State within the time specified in the deportation order. This amendment also introduced the possibility of detaining non-citizens at airports or other ports of entry for a maximum of twelve hours (2015 International Protection Act, Section 78).

According to the Irish Prison Service (IPS), there were 414 immigration law-related committals involving 406 individuals in 2018, 418 committals involving 396 individuals in 2017, 421 committals involving 408 detainees in 2016, and 342 committals involving 335 detainees in 2015.[34]

2.3 Criminalisation. Criminal penalties for violations of immigration provisions have been on the books since as early as the Aliens Act of 1935. Currently, Irish law provides criminal sanctions for at least two immigration-status related violations. “Irregular entry and stay” can result in a fine of up to 3,000 EUR and/or one-year imprisonment (see Immigration Act 2004, Section 4(9) and Section 13). Also, under the International Protection Act, “irregular exit” by asylum applicants can result in fines and/or a prison sentence of up to one month (Section 16(3.a) and (5); IPA 2005).

2.4 Asylum seekers. Generally, only a very small number of asylum seekers are detained in Ireland,[35] although observers have struggled to obtain clear statistics on this issue.[36] Irish law provides a number of grounds for detaining asylum seekers and some observers have criticised reception conditions as being overly restrictive.

In 2018, Ireland adopted the European Communities (Reception Conditions) Regulations, transposing the recast Receptions Directive,[37] which—inter alia—requires that detained asylum seekers be confined in specialised detention facilities.[38] While the new regulations have not changed the basic elements of Ireland’s asylum system, the Irish Refugee Council reports that they “do provide for a number of legislative guarantees that did not previously exist in the Irish reception context, such vulnerability assessments; appeals related to reception conditions; provisions for withdrawal and restriction of reception conditions; and provisions on detention conditions. The extent to which these provisions are being effectively implemented as of early 2019 appears to be limited in the experience of Irish Refugee Council casework.”[39]

The 2015 International Protection Act (Section 20) provides that a member of the Garda Síochána or an immigration officer can detain an asylum seeker without a warrant if there is reasonable cause to suspect that the person: (1) poses a threat to national security or public order; (2) has committed a serious non-political crime; (3) has not made reasonable efforts to establish his or her identity; (4) intends to leave the state and enter another state without lawful authority; (5) has acted or intends to act in a way that would undermine the asylum system or arrangements related to the Common Travel Area (the United Kingdom, Channel Islands, Isle of Man, and Ireland); or, (6) without reasonable cause, has destroyed his or her identity or travel documents or has been or is in possession of a forged, altered, or substituted identity document.[40]

Irish law also provides for the detention of asylum seekers subject to a Dublin transfer. Pursuant to Regulation 10(4) of the 2018 European Union (Dublin System) Regulations, a foreign national subject to a transfer procedure can be detained for up to seven days if an immigration officer or member of Garda Síochána determines a significant risk of absconding.[41]

It is unclear if the Irish government is able to provide desegregated statistics specifying the numbers of asylum seekers placed in detention. In 2013, responding to a freedom of information request sent as part of a joint Global Detention Project–Access Info Europe study, a government Freedom of Information Officer wrote that “the Irish Prison Service does not keep statistics on the specific immigration or residency status of prisoners so it is unable to provide details of ‘the total number of asylum-seekers who were placed in detention.’”[42] More recently, in early 2019, an officer at the prison service told the GDP that he would send information providing a breakdown of statistics on people detained for immigration reasons.[43] At the time of this publication (in August 2019), the GDP had still not received this information.

According to the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner (ORAC),[44] “22 applications—1.5 percent of all applications—were received from persons in places of detention” in 2014.[45] ORAC reported that during 2015, of the 335 total immigration detainees, 35 expressed a desire to apply for asylum after being detained and 17 people were given asylum interviews while still in detention.[46]

The 2015 International Protection Act streamlined Ireland’s asylum system by creating a single application procedure for asylum seekers in an attempt to shorten waiting times and reduce time spent in the Direct Provision system.[47] While agencies such as UNHCR have lauded Ireland for not emphasising the detention of asylum seekers,[48] the Direct Provision system has been widely criticised. Under this system, newly arrived asylum seekers are placed in one of the country’s reception centres,[49] which have at times lacked sufficient space to accommodate new arrivals.[50]

The accommodation centres are managed by private contractors on behalf of Ireland’s Reception and Integration Agency.[51] When Ireland introduced the Direct Provision system in 2000, the idea was for asylum seekers to live in the centres on a short-term basis for no more than six months while their applications were being processed. In practice however, many asylum seekers find themselves staying in the centres for lengthier periods of time.[52] Some observers have argued that the situation of individuals in Direct Provision amounts to de facto detention, given that in practice asylum seekers are severely limited in their ability to leave the reception centres.[53] (For more on children in the Direct Provision system, see 2.5 Children).

The treatment of asylum seekers also came under criticism because of low asylum recognition rates, which at one time were among the lowest in the EU.[54] In 2012, Ireland had a 1.5 percent acceptance at first instance and six percent on appeal. In 2014, the acceptance rate at first instance reached 12.5 percent.[55] By 2015, it had increased to 42 percent at first instance, compared to the EU average of 52 percent.[56] These rates continued to grow into 2018, according to Eurostat.[57] 

The number of asylum applications in Ireland fell every year between 2004 and 2013, with 4,766 asylum applications in 2004 and only 946 in 2013.[58] However, the country asylum applications rose to 3,670 in 2018.[59]

2.5 Children. The detention of children is explicitly forbidden as per Section 20(6) of the 2015 International Protection Act; Section 5 (2b) of the 2003 Immigration Act; and Section 5(4a) of the 1999 Immigration Act. However, concerns have been raised on occasion about the possibility of minors being placed in detention because of deficiencies in the process of determining a person’s age.[60]

Under the 2015 International Protection Act, when it appears that an unaccompanied minor is applying for asylum, an immigration officer must notify the Child and Family Agency as soon as possible. Once the Child and Family Agency is notified, it will be presumed that the individual is a child and the relevant laws and regulations related to children will apply.[61]

With regard to the possible detention of children, it should be noted that while Section 20(6) of the 2015 International Protection Act forbids the detention of children, Section 20(7) stipulates that the detention provisions of the act will apply to “a person who has indicated that he or she has not attained the age of 18 years if and for so long as” two members of the Garda Síochána, two immigration officers, or one member of the Garda Síochána and one immigration officer reasonably believe that the individual is not a child. In addition, detention provisions will apply to such individuals when just one member of the Garda Síochána or one immigration officer reasonably believes the person to be over 18, and if an age assessment determines that the person is at least 18 or if the person refuses to undergo an age assessment examination.[62]

With regards to accompanied children, Irish law stipulates that if an accompanied child is in the custody of the parent or legal guardian and this person is detained, authorities shall immediately inform the Child and Family Agency (2003 Immigration Act, Section 5(2d); 1999 Immigration Act, Section 5(4c); International Protection Act, Section 20(8)).

According to ORAC, UNHCR facilitated additional training for a group of experienced interviewers, to better prepare them for cases involving unaccompanied minors. However, the Irish Refugee Council has found that in practice, when age assessments cannot establish the exact age of an individual, “young people are not generally given the benefit of the doubt. If someone seems over 18, even by a day, there is typically a decision to move the young person into adult accommodation.”[63] Specific concerns have also been raised in relation to the provisions of the International Protection Act 2015—namely, the possibility of child asylum seekers being detained in adult prisons.[64]

Migrant child asylum seekers, along with their families, can also be accommodated in the Direct Provision system.[65] While these accommodations do not constitute places of detention, the system has been criticised in relation to children. The Children’s Rights Alliance estimates that half of the children in asylum-seeking families in Ireland live in Direct Provision accommodation centres.[66] In its 2016 concluding observations on Ireland, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child expressed concern “about reports that the majority of children in an asylum-seeking or refugee situation are accommodated in privately run centres that are not covered by national standards.”[67]

2.6 Other vulnerable groups. The Reception Conditions Regulations adopted in 2018 include a specific reference to vulnerable groups in detention. Section 19(9) stipulates that when a vulnerable applicant is held in detention, “the Minister shall ensure, taking into account the person’s particular situation, including his or her health, that: (a) the person is monitored regularly, and (b) he or she is provided with adequate support.”[68]

However, concerns regarding the identification of vulnerable individuals have been raised. In 2019, eight civil society organisations expressed alarm at the lack of vulnerability assessments for identifying special reception needs at the beginning of the asylum procedure, and highlighted this as a critical gap in the implementation of the Reception Conditions Directive.[69] According to Nasc, “It is essential  to ensure that the specialised needs of vulnerable applicants such as victims of trafficking, those who have been subjected to rape, torture, or other serious forms of psychological physical or sexual abuse are identified at the earliest possible stage so that the requisite supports can be put in place. The absence of this assessment may risk further harm and ongoing distress to this vulnerable group.” [70]

2.7 Length of detention. There are differing provisions in Irish law regarding lengths of detention, depending on a person’s specific circumstances and whether they have applied for asylum.

Asylum seekers can be detained under orders of a District Judge for consecutive 21-day “committals,” until their application has been decided. There is no limit to the number of committals, which means asylum seekers can potentially be detained indefinitely.[71] In its 2017 concluding observations, the Committee against Torture (CAT) recommended that Ireland amend its legislation so as to stipulate that asylum applicants are detained for the shortest period possible and only as a last resort.[72]

Detention pending a Dublin transfer can last up to seven days (Regulation 10, European Union Dublin System Regulations). An amendment to the 1999 Immigration Act provided in Section 78 of the 2015 International Protection Act provides that a non-citizen can be detained for up to 12 hours in a facility at a port of entry.

Pursuant to Section 5 of both the 2003 Immigration Act and the 1999 Immigration Act, unauthorised non-nationals can be detained for a period not exceeding 56 days (eight weeks). However, if they contest removal orders or appeal negative decisions, the period of time during which those legal processes are on-going are not counted as part of the eight-week detention limit.[73] While the eight-week maximum detention period is relatively short when compared to the majority of the EU countries and the EU Returns Directive (which permits detention for up to 18 months), under the EU Returns Directive, as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Kadzoev case, the period of time during appeal proceedings is to be taken into account in calculating the maximum permissible length of detention.

According to the Minister of Justice and Equality, between 2011 and 2012, 780 people were detained for immigration-related issues. Of these, 465 were detained for three days or less, 113 were detained for four to seven days, 68 were detained for eight to 14 days, 67 were detained for 15 to 30 days, 37 were detained for 31 to 50 days, and 30 were detained for 51 days or longer.[74]

2.8 Procedural standards. Immigration detainees can challenge the lawfulness of their detention through habeas corpus proceedings, pursuant to Article 40(4) of the Irish Constitution.[75] In addition, non-citizens detained under Section 5 of the 2003 Immigration Act or under Section 5 of the 1999 Immigration Act can challenge their proposed removal or deportation order—during such proceedings, the Court may also decide on the validity of detention (2003 Immigration Act, Section 5(4); 1999 Immigration Act, Section 5(7), as amended by Article 78 of the 2015 International Protection Act).[76] Automatic judicial review of detention orders exists for asylum seekers. Pursuant to Section 20 of the 2015 International Protection Act, the District Judge must review the decision as soon as possible. The judge must review (and renew) detention orders every 21 days.[77]

Irish law provides various guarantees for individuals detained for immigration purposes. These include considering the special needs of those who may have a physical or mental disability, the right of detainees to maintain contact with their family, and the fact that information regarding a detainee cannot be communicated to the consular authorities of the state from which the detainee claims to be fleeing without the detainee’s express consent, in writing.[78]

The 2015 Immigration Act enshrines several safeguards in Section 20, such as the detainee's right to consult a legal representative and to be assisted by an interpreter for the purpose of the consultations; the detainee's entitlement to have the High Commissioner and another nominated individual notified about their detention (Section 20(14)); the detainee's right to be informed about the grounds of their detention, without delay, in a language they can understand; and the provision that the detainee has to be brought before a court, as soon as possible (Section 20(15)).[79]

Prison rules, which are to be applied to persons detained, including those under the various immigration acts, are also set out in Statutory Instrument No. 252 of 2007.[80] Section 16(1) determines that a “foreign national shall be provided with the means to contact a consul and, in addition, an asylum applicant shall be provided with the means to contact (a) the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees or the Representative in Ireland of the High Commissioner, […] and national or international authorities and organisations whose principal object is to serve the interests of refugees or stateless persons or to protect the civil and human rights of such persons.” Section 16(2) further states that the detainee is to be informed about the entitlement to be visited by a legal adviser (Rule 38).

However, after the introduction of the International Protection Act in 2015, concerns were raised about its lack of provisions concerning procedural safeguards, which could prolong the asylum process as a result of lengthy appeals or result in people being wrongfully deported to countries where they may face persecution. The European Council on Refugees and Exiles noted that the procedure “lacks a mechanism to identify and assess the needs of vulnerable applicants,” in addition to including harsher detention measures and more restrictive family reunification provisions.[81]

2.9 Non-custodial measures (“alternatives to detention”). Irish law does not make explicit reference to “alternatives to detention.”[82] However, there are provisions that concern application of non-custodial measures.[83] According to Section 20(3b) of the 2015 International Protection Act and Section 14 of the 2004 Immigration Act, detainees can be released but requested to reside or remain in particular districts or locations in the state or to regularly report to an immigration officer or member of the Garda Síochána. Pursuant to Section 20(3) of the 2015 International Protection Act, a District Judge may conditionally release an applicant from detention, ordering one or more of the following: residence restriction, reporting obligations, or surrender of identity documents. If, subsequently, an applicant breaches the conditions of release, he or she can be placed in detention (Section 20(9) 2015 International Protection Act).

According to the Irish Refugee Service, these measures are seldom granted in practice.[84] An official within the Ministry for Justice and Equality stated in 2016 that “where possible, persons are served with a notice under Section 14 of the Immigration Act 2004 which provides for the issue of a written instruction setting out reporting and residence conditions to a non-national who does not have permission to be in the State. This is used in certain low risk cases as an alternative to detention prior to return.”[85]

2.10 Detaining authorities and institutions. Police (Garda Síochána) and immigration officers are legally authorised to arrest people suspected of immigration violations (Section 20(1) of the 2015 International Protection Act; Section 5(1) of the 1999 Immigration Act; and Section 5(2) of the 2003 Immigration Act). The Minister for Justice, Equality, and Law Reform can also authorise medical inspectors to detain and examine suspected non-citizens arriving at or leaving the country.[86]

2.11 Regulation of detention conditions. Immigration detention must be carried out in places prescribed for this purpose by specific legal instruments: 1999 Immigration Act (Deportation) Regulations 2005 (S.I. 55/2005); 2003 Immigration Act (Removal Places of Detention) Regulations 2005 (S.I. 56/2005); 2015 International Protection Act (Places of Detention) Regulations 2016 (S.I. 666/2016, as amended by the 2018 Reception Conditions Regulations).

For detainees held in prison facilities, the 2007 Prison Rules apply.[87] The rules stipulate, inter alia, that detainees have a right to inform their family and friends about their detention; they can take hot showers or baths; they can wear their own clothes in prison; they shall receive sufficient food; they are entitled to practice their religion; they can make at least one phone call a week; they can spend time outside of their cells; they are entitled to spend at least one hour a exercising outdoors; and they can receive visits (Prison Rules 2007 S.I. 252/2007).

Specific rules on detention conditions for foreign citizens detained under Section 20 of the 2015 International Protection Act are spelled out in Section 19 of the 2018 European Communities (Reception Conditions) Regulations. This newly adopted instrument, transposing the Reception Condition Directive, stipulates that applicants must be detained separately from prisoners and, to the extent that it is possible, from other immigration detainees who are not asylum seekers (Section 19(1)). Detained applicants shall have access to outdoor areas (Section 19(3)), and be granted the right to communicate with their family, legal representatives, NGOs, and UNHCR representatives (Section 19(4)). Detainees should also be informed of the house rules of the facility and their rights and obligations in detention (Section 19(6)).

2.12 Domestic monitoring. There are both official and non-governmental institutions that scrutinise Ireland’s treatment of migrants and asylum seekers in detention. However, as of May 2019, Ireland had yet to implement a national preventive mechanism, as required by the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture (OPCAT), which Ireland signed in 2007.[88]

The Inspector of Prisons, a statutory independent office established under the 2007 Prisons Act, is responsible for monitoring the country's prisons. Concerns have been raised over gaps in its monitoring[89] and the extent to which it has focused on the appropriateness of the conditions of confinement of people in immigration or asylum procedures is unclear.[90]

Among the civil society groups that have monitored Ireland’s immigration detention practices are the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre (Nasc),[91] the Irish Refugee Council,[92] the Irish Penal Reform Trust,[93] and the Immigrant Council of Ireland.[94]

2.13 International monitoring. Ireland’s immigration detention practices have been the focus of numerous reports and investigations by regional and international human rights mechanisms, particularly its use of prisons for immigration and asylum procedures. 

Ireland is a member state of the Council of Europe and has ratified the European Convention on the Prevention of Torture. Consequently, it receives periodic visits from the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT), which has systematically criticised Ireland for its use of prisons and urged it to establish specialised detention centres, including after its visit in September 2014, when it admonished the country: “A prison is by definition not a suitable place in which to detain someone who is neither suspected nor convicted of a criminal offence.”[95] The CPT has a planned visit to Ireland in 2019.[96]

Ireland is also party to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT) and has signed the Optional Protocol (OPCAT). Like the CPT, the Committee on the Prevention of Torture, which reviews states’ implementation of the CAT, has repeatedly raised concerns about Ireland’s use of prisons for immigration purposes.[97] As of May 2019, Ireland had not ratified the OPCAT, which has impeded the UN Subcommittee on the Prevention of Torture (SPT) from monitoring its places of detention. Nor has it established a National Preventive Mechanism, as mandated in the OPCAT.[98] 

2.14 Trends and statistics. According to the Irish Prison Service, Ireland detained 406 individual non-citizens in 2018 (compared to 414 overall committals, implying that some people were detained twice), 396 persons in 2017, 408 in 2016, 335 in 2015, 390 in 2014, 374 in 2013, 385 in 2012, 395 in 2011, and 459 in 2010.[99]

The average daily number of detainees held in immigration detention was 11 in 2018,[100] eight in 2017,[101] five in 2016,[102] and four in 2015.[103]

In 2014, most detainees came from Albania (71), China (62), Nigeria (28), and Pakistan (27).[104] Similarly, the top nationalities of detainees, between 2012 and 2017, were Albanians (280); Chinese (212); Brazilians (173); Pakistanis (157), and Nigerians (126).[105]

Statistics regarding committals to Garda stations are not publicly available. According to information gathered by the GDP, these figures could only be obtained by submitting a parliamentary question or by formulating a request based on the Freedom of Information Act.[106]

1,385 non-citizens were ordered to leave Ireland in 2018; 1,105 in 2017; 1,355 in 2016, and 875 in 2015.[107] 365 persons were returned following an order to leave in 2018; 315 in 2017; 585 in 2016; and 365 in 2015.[108]

 

3. DETENTION INFRASTRUCTURE

3.1 Summary. Unlike its EU neighbours, Ireland does not have dedicated immigration detention centres. Rather, non-citizens subject to administrative detention can be confined briefly at police stations before being transferred to a select group of criminal prisons, which are operated by the Irish Prison Service (IPS). Importantly, because Ireland is not a state party to the EU Returns Directive, the practice of using penitentiaries for immigration purposes does not face the same legal challenges that it faces in other EU countries. The directive, which stipulates the use of separate facilities for this purpose, has led to rulings by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) against this practice, most notably in Germany.[109]

3.2 Detention facilities. Places of detention are determined by Irish law and can vary depending on the ground for detention. In total, nine prisons are authorised for immigration detention, together with every Garda station in the country.

For those detained under the 1999 Immigration Act, the 1999 Immigration Act 1999 (Deportation) Regulations of 2005 apply. For those detained under the 2003 Immigration Act, the 2003 Immigration Act (Removal Places of Detention) Regulations of 2005 apply. Both regulations list the same facilities that individuals can be held in: Every Garda Síochána station and Castlerea Prison; Cloverhill Prison; Cork Prison, Limerick Prison, the Midlands Prison; Mountjoy Prison; Saint Patrick’s Institution (Dublin, closed in 2017); the Training Unit (Glengarriff Parade, Dublin); and Wheatfield Prison (Dublin).

For those detained under the 2015 International Protection Act, the 2015 International Protection Act (Places of Detention) Regulations, as amended by the 2018 Reception Conditions Regulations, apply. Applicants may be detained in the following facilities: Every Garda Síochána station and Cloverhill Prison (2018 Reception Conditions Regulations, Section 31). 

Although nine prisons are listed, according to the Irish Department of Justice and Equality, by 2013 only seven prisons were in use for immigration-related reasons: Castlerea Prison, Cloverhill Prison, Cork Prison, Limerick Prison, Mountjoy Prison, Dochas (Mountjoy Women’s Prison), and Wheatfield Prison.[110] At one time, Ireland also reportedly used the Arbour Hill prison in Dublin to hold non-citizens for immigration reasons, despite the fact that it was not designated in the 2003 Immigration Act for this purpose.[111]

The prisons traditionally used for immigration purposes have been Cloverhill Prison (for men) and the Dóchas Centre at Mountjoy Prison (for women).[112] In 2014, 273 non-citizens were held in Cloverhill and 76 in Dóchas. However, as stated above, the prescribed places of detention for applicants detained under the 2015 International Protection Act (amended with the adoption of the 2018 Reception Conditions Regulations) include just Cloverhill Prison (and Garda Stations). According to the Irish Refugee Council, it is unclear where women are supposed to be held since these changes have been introduced.[113] Various observers, however, informed the GDP that the Dochas remains the main facility for woman detainees

 3.2a Dublin Airport. Individuals refused entry may be detained in Dublin Airport until the next available flight. According to Nasc, this is not a designated place of detention and those placed there do not have access to legal safeguards and basic entitlements, such as access to a lawyer, medical assistance, or substantial review of decision. Nasc also observed that at times people are not placed on the next available flight and thus spend several hours at the airport.[114]

3.3 Conditions and regimes in detention centres. Observers have long criticised Ireland’s practice of confining immigration detainees in prisons, as well as the conditions of detention for asylum seekers and migrants in these facilities. Discussing this practice, Nasc states that “international best practice … dictates that immigration detainees should not be housed with the main prison population, as they have not been suspected nor convicted of a crime.”[115]

Research undertaken by the Irish Refugee Council, the Immigrant Council of Ireland, and the Irish Penal Reform Trust has found that accommodation in prisons with people suspected of and/or sentenced for having committed criminal offences can be extremely traumatic for immigration detainees. They reported that immigration detainees in Ireland are a “particularly disadvantaged group—away from the public eye they may not have access to services which have been made available for immigrants, they may not be made aware of their rights and entitlements or may not be able to exercise them because of language and/or literacy difficulties.”[116] The report further highlighted problems experienced due to cultural difference, compounded by a lack of access to legal aid.[117]

Perhaps most notable have been the repeated calls by CPT to end this practice, as well as by the UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), which in 2008 urged Ireland “to take immediate and effective measures to ensure that all persons detained for immigration related reasons are held in facilities specifically designed for this purpose.”[118] In 2014, HRC also highlighted several deficiencies in the prisons system, including with respect to immigration detainees. It stated: “the Committee is concerned at the lack of progress in eliminating adverse conditions in a number of prisons in the State party, such as … lack of segregation of remand and convicted prisoners, and between detained immigrants and sentenced prisoners.”[119]

In its 2015 report to the government of Ireland, the CPT stated that “a prison is by definition not a suitable place in which to detain someone who is neither suspected nor convicted of a criminal offence. In those cases where it is deemed necessary to deprive persons of their liberty for an extended period under aliens legislation, they should be accommodated in centres specifically designed for that purpose.” However, because immigration detainees continue to be held in prisons, the CPT noted that “all appropriate steps should be taken to ensure that their exposure to remand and sentenced prisoners is limited, that they are offered as much time out of cell as possible and that they are afforded open visits.” Although the CPT recognised that considerable steps had been taken by the government to improve the prison system, it also expressed concern about the inability of prison managers and officers to properly care for immigration detainees. The CPT urged the Irish government to continue pursuing the establishment of a detention centre designed specifically for immigration detainees.[120] In 2017, the CAT also expressed concerns regarding the absence of a dedicated facility for immigration-related detention. The committee further stressed that the Irish government must guarantee the segregation of immigration detainees from other prisoners.[121]

In its response to the 2015 report of the CPT, the Irish government noted that “detention is used sparingly in relation to immigration related matters” and that in certain low risk cases, reporting and residence conditions are used as an alternative to detention. It also stated that immigration detainees are “in general kept apart from convicted persons while in detention.”[122]

The government also reported that plans for a dedicated immigration detention facility at Dublin Airport were progressing, with the facility originally intended to be ready by 2016. The opening, however, has been repeatedly delayed. During parliamentary questioning in July 2016, an official at the Ministry for Justice and Equality stated that “plans are being progressed for the provision of a dedicated immigration detention facility at Dublin Airport. … This redevelopment will be completed as soon as possible within the next 12 months and will replace the existing Garda Station at the airport, provide office accommodation for Gardaí and civilians as well as providing a modern detention facility.”[123]

This Dublin airport facility, however, has never materialised, and in mid-2017 the Ministry of Justice stated that the construction of a dedicated immigration detention centre was supposed to start in September 2017 and to be completed ten months later in July 2018.[124] During parliamentary questioning in October 2017, authorities clarified that construction was still pending. The Minister of Justice and Equality confirmed that the commencement of the project’s development phase was due during the fourth quarter of 2017.[125] In June 2018, however, in response to a parliamentary question, the Minister for Justice and Equality stated that works began in May 2018 and were expected to be completed by December of the same year.[126] However, as of early 2019 the Dublin Airport facility had not yet opened.[127] According to a June 2019 newspaper article of the Irish Examiner, based on information provided by Garda authorities, the dedicated facility of Dublin Airport was to open later in 2019. The report also indicated that the detention centre will be located in the Transaer House building, which will also host a new Garda station. The detention facility will be composed of two detention rooms.[128]

 

 


[1] Nasc, the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre, “Immigration Detention and Border Control in Ireland: Revisiting Irish Law, Policy and Practice,” 2018, http://www.nascireland.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Nasc-Immigration-Detention-Border-Control-in-Ireland.pdf; Irish Prison Service (IPS), “Annual Report 2018,” 2019, https://www.irishprisons.ie/wp-content/uploads/documents_pdf/Annual-Report-2018.pdf

[2] UN Committee against Torture (CAT), “Concluding Observations on the Second Periodic Report of Ireland, CAT/C/IRL/CO/2,”  31 August 2017, https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CAT/C/IRL/CO/2&Lang=En; European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), “Report to the Government of Ireland on the Visit to Ireland Carried Out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 16 to 26 September 2014,” Council of Europe, 17 November 2015, https://rm.coe.int/1680696c9a

[3] See, for instance, M. Flynn, “Be Careful What You Wish For,” Forced Migration Review, September 2013, https://www.fmreview.org/detention/flynn 

[4] Nasc, the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre, “Immigration Detention and Border Control in Ireland: Revisiting Irish Law, Policy and Practice,” 2018, http://www.nascireland.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Nasc-Immigration-Detention-Border-Control-in-Ireland.pdf

[5] European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), “Report to the Government of Ireland on the Visit to Ireland Carried Out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 16 to 26 September 2014,” Council of Europe, 17 November 2015, https://rm.coe.int/1680696c9a

[6] European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), “The CPT and Ireland,” https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/ireland

[7] The Independent, “Calls for Apology for Brazilian Au Pair 'Unfairly' Detained in Irish prison on Visit to Ireland,” 30 July 2017, https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/calls-for-apology-for-brazilian-au-pair-unfairly-detained-in-irish-prison-on-visit-to-ireland-35982146.html

[8] M. Byrne and E. Quinn, “The Effectiveness of Return in EU Member States: Challenges and Good Practices Linked to EU Rules and Standards,” European Migration Network, November 2017, https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/14a_ireland_effectiveness_of_return_final_en.pdf

[9] The Irish Times, “421 People Committed to Prison in 2016 on Immigration-Related Issues,” 20 July 2017, https://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/421-people-committed-to-prison-in-2016-on-immigration-related-issues-1.3161858

[10] UN Committee against Torture (CAT), “Concluding Observations on the Second Periodic Report of Ireland, CAT/C/IRL/CO/2,” 31 August 2017, https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CAT/C/IRL/CO/2&Lang=En

[11] The Irish Times, “Work on Dublin Airport Immigration Detention Centre to begin,” 28 July 2017, https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/work-on-dublin-airport-immigration-detention-centre-to-begin-1.3169079

[12] Minister for Justice and Equality, “Response to Parliamentary Question 545, Detention Centres Provision – Dàil Éireann Debate,” 12 June 2018, https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2018-06-12/545/#pq-answers-545

[13] Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[14] A. Bracken, “Brand New €3.6m Garda Station Lying Idle At Dublin Airport Amid Row,” Extra.ie, 17 June 2019, https://extra.ie/2019/06/17/news/irish-news/garda-station-dublin-airport-row; C. O’Keefe, “Dedicated Immigration Facility Due to Open at Dublin Airport,” Irish Examiner, 12 June 2019, https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/dedicated-immigration-facility-due-to-open-at-dublin-airport-930395.html

[15] A. Bracken, “Brand New €3.6m Garda Station Lying Idle At Dublin Airport Amid Row,” Extra.ie, 17 June 2019, https://extra.ie/2019/06/17/news/irish-news/garda-station-dublin-airport-row

[16] European Council of Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), “Ireland: Planned Opt-In to Recast Reception Conditions Directive,” 24 November 2017, https://www.ecre.org/ireland-planned-opt-in-to-recast-reception-conditions-directive/

[17] European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), “Ireland: New Reception Rules Following Opt-In To the EU Directive,” 13 July 2018, https://www.ecre.org/ireland-new-reception-rules-following-opt-in-to-eu-directive/; Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[18] Nasc, the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre, “Immigration Detention and Border Control in Ireland: Revisiting Irish Law, Policy and Practice,” 2018, http://www.nascireland.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Nasc-Immigration-Detention-Border-Control-in-Ireland.pdf

[19] Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[20] Nasc, the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre, “Immigration Residence & Protection Bill (Archive),” http://www.nascireland.org/campaigns-for-change/immigration-residence-protection-bill/

[21] Irish Refugee Council, “The Right to Protection: Submission to the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Justice, Equality, Defence and Women’s Rights on the Protection Aspects of the Immigration, Residence and Protection Bill,” March 2008, http://www.irishrefugeecouncil.ie/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/IRC-Submission-on-the-IRP-Bill-2008.pdf

[22] European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), “Asylum Reforms in Ireland will Fail Refugees,” 8 January 2016, http://www.ecre.org/component/content/article/70-weekly-bulletin-articles/1333-asylum-reforms-in-ireland-will-fail-refugees-.html; The Irish Immigrant Support Centre, “Immigration Residence & Protection Bill (Archive),” http://www.nascireland.org/campaigns-for-change/immigration-residence-protection-bill/; European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), “AIDA 2016 Update: Ireland,” 13 March 2017, https://www.ecre.org/aida-2016-update-ireland/

[23] European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), “Asylum Reforms in Ireland will Fail Refugees,” 8 January 2016, http://www.ecre.org/component/content/article/70-weekly-bulletin-articles/1333-asylum-reforms-in-ireland-will-fail-refugees-.html

[24] Irish Refugee Council, “International Protection Act 2015 is a Step Backwards for Ireland’s Support for Refugees, Say Irish Refugee Council,” 30 December 2015, http://www.irishrefugeecouncil.ie/news/international-protection-act-2015-is-a-step-backwards-for-irelands-support-for-refugees-say-irish-refugee-council/4533

[25] European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), “Ireland: New Reception Rules Following Opt-In To the EU Directive,” 13 July 2018, https://www.ecre.org/ireland-new-reception-rules-following-opt-in-to-eu-directive/; Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[26] Nasc, the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre, “Immigration Detention and Border Control in Ireland: Revisiting Irish Law, Policy and Practice,” 2018, http://www.nascireland.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Nasc-Immigration-Detention-Border-Control-in-Ireland.pdf

[27] Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[28] E. Quinn and G. Kingston, “Practical Measures for Reducing Irregular Migration,” European Migration Network/ Economic and Social Research Institute, March 2012, http://emn.ie/files/p_201205080239292012_Irregular%20Migration%20Study_Mar2012.pdf

[29] Nasc, the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre, “Immigration Detention & Border Control in Ireland. Revisiting Irish Law, Policy and Practice,” 14 March 2018, http://www.nascireland.org/feature-reports/immigration-detention-border-control-ireland/

[30] Government of Ireland, “Immigration Act 2003, Section 5.2,” http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2003/act/26/section/5/enacted/en/html#sec5

[31]  Government of Ireland, “Observations of Ireland on the Questionnaire Related to: The Right of Anyone Deprived of His or Her Liberty by Arrest or Detention to Bring Proceedings Before Court, in Order that the Court May Decide Without Delay on the Lawfulness of His or Her Detention and Order His or Her Release if the Detention is Not Lawful,” UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, 2013, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Detention/Pages/QuestionnaireDraftBasicPrinciples.aspx

[32] Government of Ireland, “Immigration Act 1999 Section 3.1,” http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1999/act/22/section/3/enacted/en/html#sec3 

[33] Government of Ireland, “Immigration Act 1999 Section 5.1,” http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1999/act/22/section/5/enacted/en/html#sec5.

[34] Irish Prison Service (IPS), “Annual Report,” 2017, http://www.irishprisons.ie/wp-content/uploads/documents_pdf/12631-IPS-annualreport-2016_Web.pdf; Irish Prisons Service (IPS), “Annual Report 2017,” 2018, https://www.irishprisons.ie/wp-content/uploads/documents_pdf/IPS-annualreport-2017.pdf; Irish Prisons Service (IPS), “Annual Report 2017,” 2018, https://bit.ly/2TOsA90

[35] Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[36] See, for example, Global Detention Project (GDP) and Access Info Europe, “The Uncounted: The Detention of Migrants and Asylum Seekers in Europe,” 2015, https://www.globaldetentionproject.org/the-uncounted-the-detention-of-migrants-and-asylum-seekers-in-europe

[37] European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), “Ireland: New Reception Rules Following Opt-In To the EU Directive,” 13 July 2018, https://www.ecre.org/ireland-new-reception-rules-following-opt-in-to-eu-directive/; Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[38] Nasc, the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre, “Immigration Detention and Border Control in Ireland: Revisiting Irish Law, Policy and Practice,” 2018, http://www.nascireland.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Nasc-Immigration-Detention-Border-Control-in-Ireland.pdf

[39] Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[40] Government of Ireland, “International Protection Act 2015, Section 20,”  http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2015/act/66/section/20/enacted/en/html#sec20

[41] Government of Ireland, “S.I. No. 62/2018 – European Union (Dublin System) Regulations 2018,” 2018, http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2018/si/62/made/en/print

[42] Aisling Brennan (Ireland Department of Justice and Equality), Letter to Lydia Medland (Access Info) Responding to Joint Access Info-Global Detention Project Questionnaire, 14 October 2013.

[43] Irish Prison Service (IPS), Phone call with Agnese Zucca (Global Detention Project), 9 May 2019.

[44] With the implementation of the International Protection Act 2015, ORAC was abolished and certain functions were transferred to the newly established International Protection Office within the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service, which is responsible for the assessment of applications. The former Refugee Appeals Tribunal was replaced by the International Protection Appeal Tribunal (IPAT), a statutorily independent body. See: ORAC, “Important Information Notice: Abolition of ORAC and Transfer of Certain Functions to New International Protection Office,” http://www.orac.ie/website/orac/oracwebsite.nsf/page/index-en; Department of Justice and Equality, “Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service: Immigration in Ireland: Annual Review 2016,” http://justice.ie/en/JELR/INIS_Immigration_in_Ireland_Annual_Review_2016.pdf/Files/INIS_Immigration_in_Ireland_Annual_Review_2016.pdf

[45] Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner, “Annual Report - 2014,” 2015, http://www.orac.ie/website/orac/oracwebsite.nsf/page/CRSE-9XQK2A15304722-en/$File/2014%20Annual%20Report.pdf

[46] Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner, “Annual Report - 2015,” 2016, https://bit.ly/2dmWsbu

[47] K. Holland, “Government Pledge on Asylum Reform Report Dropped,” The Irish Times, 14 May 2016, http://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/government-pledge-on-asylum-reform-report-dropped-1.2647500

[48] United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), “Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights’ Compilation Report - Universal Periodic Review: Ireland,” March 2011, http://bit.ly/2HNXnLT

[49] L. Thornton, “Time to Legislate for Direct Provision System for Asylum Seekers,” Irish Times, 5 August 2013, http://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/oireachtas/time-to-legislate-for-direct-provision-system-for-asylum-seekers-1.1484416; Working Group to Report to Government on Improvements to the Protection Process, including Direct Provision and Supports to Asylum Seekers, “Final Report,” Government of Ireland, June 2015, http://bit.ly/1GYBUL5; Ó. Ryan, “Plan to Open a Direct Provision Centre in Leitrim Scrapped,” The Journal.ie, 21 March 2019, https://www.thejournal.ie/direct-provision-centre-rooskey-4553521-Mar2019/

[50] Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[51] Children’s Rights Alliance, “Report Card 2016,” 6 February 2016, http://www.childrensrights.ie/content/report-card-2016-1

[52] Working Group to Report to Government on Improvements to the Protection Process, Including Direct Provision and Supports to Asylum Seekers, “Final Report,” Government of Ireland, June 2015, http://bit.ly/1GYBUL5

[53] M. Rachel and E. Steinerte, “Ireland and the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention Against Torture,” Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission, January 2017, https://www.ihrec.ie/app/uploads/2017/09/Ireland-and-the-Optional-Protocol-to-the-UN-Convention-against-Torture.pdf; Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[54] See, for example, L. Thornton, “Ireland’s Asylum & Direct Provision System Under the Spotlight in Northern Ireland High Court,” Human Rights in Ireland, 14 August 2013, http://rightsni.org/2013/08/ireland%E2%80%99s-asylum-direct-provision-system-under-the-spotlight-in-northern-ireland-high-court/

[55] K. Foxe, “Seeking Asylum in Ireland,” RTÉ Ireland, (Investigations Unit), 20 October 2015, http://www.rte.ie/iu/asylum/

[56] Eurostat, “Asylum Decisions in the EU: EU Member States Granted Protection to More than 185,000 Asylum Seekers in 2014,” European Union, 12 May 2015, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/6827382/3-12052015-AP-EN.pdf/6733f080-c072-4bf5-91fc-f591abf28176

[57] Eurostat, “Asylum and First Time Asylum Applicants by Citizenship, Age and Sex. Annual Aggregated Data (Rounded),” Asylum and Dublin Statistics, 8 April 2019, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=migr_asyappctza&lang=en

[58] K. Foxe, “Seeking Asylum in Ireland,” RTÉ Ireland (Investigations Unit), 20 October 2015, http://www.rte.ie/iu/asylum/; Irish Refugee Council, “Statistics: Republic of Ireland,” Asylum Information. Database (AIDA), http://www.asylumineurope.org/reports/country/republic-ireland/statistics

[59] Eurostat, “Asylum and First Time Asylum Applicants by Citizenship, Age and Sex. Annual Aggregated Data (Rounded),” Asylum and Dublin Statistics, 8 April 2019, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=migr_asyappctza&lang=en

[60] Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database, November 2015, http://www.asylumineurope.org/reports/country/republic-ireland

[61] Government of Ireland, “International Protection Act 2015, Section 14,” http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2015/act/66/section/14/enacted/en/html

[62] Government of Ireland, “International Protection Act 2015, Section 20,” http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2015/act/66/section/20/enacted/en/html

[63] Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database, November 2015, http://www.asylumineurope.org/reports/country/republic-ireland

[64] F. Gartland, “New Asylum Laws Could See Under-18s in Adult Jails, Conference Told,” The Irish Times, 7 March 2016, http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/new-asylum-laws-could-see-under-18s-in-adult-jails-conference-told-1.2563595

[65] Irish Penal Reform Trust, “Children’s Rights Behind Bars, Human Rights of Children Deprived of Liberty: Improving Monitoring Mechanisms, National Report: Ireland,” August 2014, http://www.iprt.ie/contents/2685

[66] Children’s Rights Alliance, “Report Card 2016,” 6 February 2016, http://www.childrensrights.ie/content/report-card-2016-1

[67] UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC), “Concluding Observations on the Combined Third and Fourth Periodic Reports of Ireland, CRC/C/IRL/CO/3-4,” 29 January 2016, http://www.refworld.org/docid/56c17f574.html

[68] Government of Ireland, “European Communities (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2018, S.I. No. 230 of 2018, 2018, http://opac.oireachtas.ie/AWData/Library3/JUQdoclaid060718_155358.pdf

[69] Irish Refugee Council, “Refugee Organisations Highlight Absence of Vulnerability Assessment in Irish Asylum Procedure,” 27 May 2019, https://www.irishrefugeecouncil.ie/news/refugee-organisations-highlight-absence-of-vulnerability-assessment-in-irish-asylum-proceedure/7094

[70] Irish Refugee Council, “Refugee Organisations Highlight Absence of Vulnerability Assessment in Irish Asylum Procedure,” 27 May 2019, https://www.irishrefugeecouncil.ie/news/refugee-organisations-highlight-absence-of-vulnerability-assessment-in-irish-asylum-proceedure/7094

[71] Irish Refugee Council, “Duration of Detention,” Asylum Information Database, http://www.asylumineurope.org/reports/country/republic-ireland/detention-asylum-seekers/legal-framework-detention/duration ; Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[72] UN Committee against Torture (CAT), “Concluding Observations on the Second Periodic Report of Ireland,” CAT/C/IRL/CO/2,” 31 August 2017, https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CAT/C/IRL/CO/2&Lang=En

[73] Government of Ireland, “Immigration Act 2003 Section 5.2,” http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2003/act/26/section/5/enacted/en/html#sec5

[74] Nasc, the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre, “Parliamentary Question: Immigration Data (Length of Time in Detention),” 29 January 2014, http://www.nascireland.org/parliamentary-questions/pq-immigration-data-length-time-detention/

[75] Government of Ireland, “Constitution of Ireland – Bunreacht na hÉireann,” December 2018, http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/pdf/en.cons.pdf; Nasc, the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre, “Immigration Detention and Border Control in Ireland. Revisiting Irish Law, Policy and Practice,” 14 March 2018, http://www.nascireland.org/feature-reports/immigration-detention-border-control-ireland/; Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[76] Nasc, the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre, “Immigration Detention and Border Control in Ireland. Revisiting Irish Law, Policy and Practice,” 14 March 2018, http://www.nascireland.org/feature-reports/immigration-detention-border-control-ireland/; Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[77] Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[78] Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database, November 2015, http://www.asylumineurope.org/reports/country/republic-ireland

[79] Government of Ireland, “International Protection Act 2015, Section 20,” http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2015/act/66/section/20/enacted/en/html

[80] Government of Ireland, “ S.I. No. 252/2007 - Prison Rules, 2007, Section 16,” http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2007/si/252/made/en/print#article16; Irish Refugee Council, “Legal Assistance for Review of Detention, Republic of Ireland,”  http://www.asylumineurope.org/reports/country/republic-ireland/detention-asylum-seekers/procedural-safeguards/legal-assistance

[81] European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), “Asylum Reforms in Ireland Will Fail Refugees,” 8 January 2016, http://www.ecre.org/component/content/article/70-weekly-bulletin-articles/1333-asylum-reforms-in-ireland-will-fail-refugees-.html

[82] Government of Ireland, “Immigration Act 2003 Section 5.2,” http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2003/act/26/section/5/enacted/en/html#sec5

[83] Irish Refugee Council, “Alternatives to Detention,” Asylum Information Database, http://www.asylumineurope.org/reports/country/republic-ireland/detention-asylum-seekers/legal-framework-detention/alternatives ; Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[84]  Government of Ireland, “International Protection Act 2015, Section 20 (3b),”  http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2015/act/66/section/20/enacted/en/html; Government of Ireland, “Immigration Act 14, Section 14,” http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2004/act/1/section/14/enacted/en/html#sec14

[85] Minister for Justice and Equality (Deputy Frances Fitzgerald), “Dáil Answer to Question No 69, Addressed by Deputy Jonathan O’Brien,” 7 July 2016, http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/debateswebpack.nsf/takes/dail2016070700075

[86] Government of Ireland, “Immigration Act 2004 Section 3.3,” http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2004/act/1/section/3/enacted/en/html#sec3

[87] Nasc, the Migrant and refugee Rights Centre, “Immigration Detention and Border Control in Ireland. Revisiting Irish Law, Policy and Practice,” 14 March 2018, http://www.nascireland.org/feature-reports/immigration-detention-border-control-ireland/

[88] Association for the Prevention of Torture, “Global Status of Ratifications, Signatures and NPM Designations Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture,” 2019, https://apt.ch/en/global-status/

[89] UN Committee against Torture (CAT), “Concluding Observations on the Second Periodic Report of Ireland, CAT /C/IRL/CO/2,” 31 August 2017, http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CAT/C/IRL/CO/2&Lang=En

[90] Office of the Inspector of Prisons, “Homepage,” http://www.inspectorofprisons.gov.ie/en/IOP/Pages/home

[91] See, for example, Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre (Nasc), “Immigration Detention and Border Control in Ireland: Revisiting Irish Law, Policy and Practice,” 2018, http://www.nascireland.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Nasc-Immigration-Detention-Border-Control-in-Ireland.pdf

[92] See, for example, Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[93] Irish Penal Reform Trust, “Immigration Detention,” http://www.iprt.ie/immigration-detention; M. Kelly, “Immigration Related Detention in Ireland: A Report for the Irish Refugee Council, Irish Penal Reform Trust and Immigrant Council of Ireland,” November 2005, http://www.iprt.ie/files/immigrationrelated_detention_report.pdf

[94] Immigrant Council of Ireland, “Homepage,” https://www.immigrantcouncil.ie/; M. Kelly, “Immigration Related Detention in Ireland: A Report for the Irish Refugee Council, Irish Penal Reform Trust and Immigrant Council of Ireland,” November 2005, http://www.iprt.ie/files/immigrationrelated_detention_report.pdf

[95] European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), “Report to the Government of Ireland on the Visit to Ireland Carried Out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 16 to 26 September 2014,” Council of Europe, 17 November 2015, https://rm.coe.int/1680696c9a

[96] European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), “The CPT and Ireland,” https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/ireland

[97] UN Committee against Torture (CAT), “Concluding Observations on the Second Periodic Report of Ireland, CAT/C/IRL/CO/2,” 31 August 2017, https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CAT/C/IRL/CO/2&Lang=En

[98] United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (OHCHR), “Reporting Status for Ireland,” http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/TreatyBodyExternal/countries.aspx?CountryCode=IRL&Lang=EN

[99] Nasc, the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre, “Immigration Detention and Border Control in Ireland: Revisiting Irish Law, Policy and Practice,” 2018, http://www.nascireland.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Nasc-Immigration-Detention-Border-Control-in-Ireland.pdf; Irish Prisons Service (IPS), “Annual Report 2017,” 2018, https://www.irishprisons.ie/wp-content/uploads/documents_pdf/IPS-annualreport-2017.pdf; Irish Prisons Service (IPS), “Annual Report 2018,” 2019, https://www.irishprisons.ie/wp-content/uploads/documents_pdf/Annual-Report-2018.pdf

[100] Irish Prison Service (IPS), “Annual Report 2018,” 2019, https://www.irishprisons.ie/wp-content/uploads/documents_pdf/Annual-Report-2018.pdf

[101] Irish Prisons Service (IPS), "Annual Report 2017," 2018, https://www.irishprisons.ie/wp-content/uploads/documents_pdf/IPS-annualreport-2017.pdf

[102] Irish Prisons Service (IPS), "Annual Report 2016," 2017, http://www.irishprisons.ie/wp-content/uploads/documents_pdf/12631-IPS-annualreport-2016_Web.pdf

[103] Irish Prisons Service (IPS), "Annual Report 2015," 2016, http://www.irishprisons.ie/wp-content/uploads/documents_pdf/12232-Irish-Prison-Service-AnnualReport2015-v7-2.pdf

[104] Nasc, the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre, “Immigration Detention and Border Control in Ireland: Revisiting Irish Law, Policy and Practice,” 2018, http://www.nascireland.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Nasc-Immigration-Detention-Border-Control-in-Ireland.pdf

[105] F. Maresa, “New Figures Prompt Calls for Greater Transparency on Immigration Enforcement in Republic of Ireland,” The Detail, 12 February 2018, https://www.thedetail.tv/articles/republic-of-ireland-s-record-on-immigration-enforcement-prompts-calls-for-greater-transparency; Nasc, the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre, “Immigration Detention and Border Control in Ireland: Revisiting Irish Law, Policy and Practice,” 2018, http://www.nascireland.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Nasc-Immigration-Detention-Border-Control-in-Ireland.pdf

[106] Nick Henderson (Irish Refugee Council), Email exchange with Michael Flynn (Global Detention Project), 14 June 2019.

[107] Eurostat, “Third-Country Nationals Ordered to Leave – Annual Data,” Enforcement of immigration legislation, 17 April 2019, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=migr_eiord&lang=en

[108] Eurostat, “Third-Country Nationals Returned Following an Order to Leave – Annual Data” Enforcement of immigration legislation, 17 April 2019, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=migr_eirtn&lang=en

[109] See the 2014 CJEU judgement in: “Bero and Bouzalmate,” 17 July 2014, http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-473/13

[110] Aisling Brennan (Ireland Department of Justice and Equality), Letter to Lydia Medland (Access Info) Responding to Joint Access Info-Global Detention Project Questionnaire, 14 October 2013.

[111] Irish Prison Service (IPS), “Irish Prison Service Annual Report 2007,” 18 December 2008, www.irishprisons.ie/documents/IPS_AR_2007.pdf

[112] T. O’Riordan, “Ireland of the Exclusionary Welcomes: Uncovering Immigration-Related Detention,” Irish Quarterly Review, 96 (381), March 2007, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27896430?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[113] Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[114] Nasc, the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre, “Immigration Detention and Border Control in Ireland: Revisiting Irish Law, Policy and Practice,” 2018, http://www.nascireland.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Nasc-Immigration-Detention-Border-Control-in-Ireland.pdf

[115] Fiona Finn (Nasc), Email correspondence with Global Detention Project (GDP), 1 July 2016.

[116] M. Kelly, “Immigration-Related Detention in Ireland: Research Report for the Irish Refugee Council,” Irish Penal Reform Trust and Immigrant Council of Ireland, November 2005, http://idc.rfbf.com.au/wp- content/uploads/2009/06/irc-detention-report-2005.pdf

[117] M. Kelly, “Immigration-Related Detention in Ireland: Research Report for the Irish Refugee Council,” Irish Penal Reform Trust and Immigrant Council of Ireland, November 2005, http://idc.rfbf.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/irc-detention-report-2005.pdf

[118] UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), “Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant: Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Committee – Ireland,” http://www.refworld.org/publisher,HRC,CONCOBSERVATIONS,IRL,48c4ff452,0.html

[119] UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), “Concluding Observations on the Fourth Periodic Report of Ireland CCPR/C/IRL/CO/4,” 19 August 2014, http://bit.ly/1P3CIPE

[120] European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), “Report to the Government of Ireland on the Visit to Ireland Carried Out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 16 to 26 September 2014,” 17 November 2015, https://rm.coe.int/1680696c9a

[121] UN Committee against Torture (CAT), “Concluding Observations on the Second Periodic Report of Ireland, CAT/C/IRL/CO/2,” 31 August 2017, https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CAT/C/IRL/CO/2&Lang=En

[122] Government of Ireland, “Response of the Government of Ireland to the Report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment on its Visit to Ireland from 16 to 26 September 2014,” 17 November 2015, http://www.refworld.org/docid/5666fcf34.html

[123] Minister for Justice and Equality (Deputy Frances Fitzgerald), “Dáil Answer to Question No 69, Addressed by Deputy Jonathan O’Brien,” 7 July 2016, http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/debateswebpack.nsf/takes/dail2016070700075

[124] The Irish Times, “Work on Dublin Airport Immigration Detention Centre to begin,” The Irish Times, 28 July 2017, https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/work-on-dublin-airport-immigration-detention-centre-to-begin-1.3169079

[125]  Department of Justice and Equality, “Parliamentary Questions,” 19 October 2017, http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/PQ-19-10-2017-134

[126] Minister for Justice and Equality, “Response to Parliamentary Question 545, Detention Centres Provision – Dàil Éireann Debate,” 12 June 2018, https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2018-06-12/545/#pq-answers-545

[127] Irish Refugee Council, “Country Report: Ireland,” Asylum Information Database (AIDA), European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), February 2019, http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_ie_2018update.pdf

[128] A. Bracken, “Brand New €3.6m Garda Station Lying Idle At Dublin Airport Amid Row,” Extra.ie, 17 June 2019, https://extra.ie/2019/06/17/news/irish-news/garda-station-dublin-airport-row; C. O’Keefe, “Dedicated Immigration Facility Due to Open at Dublin Airport,” Irish Examiner, 12 June 2019, https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/dedicated-immigration-facility-due-to-open-at-dublin-airport-930395.html

 

DETENTION STATISTICS

Migration Detainee Entries
Not Available
2020
490
2019
406
2018
396
2017
408
2016
335
2015
407
2014
836
2013
385
2012
914
2012
395
2011
973
2011
459
2010
1,279
2010
1,374
2009
Immigration Detainees as Percentage of Total Migrant population (Year)
0.05
2016
0.04
2015
0.11
2013
0.17
2010

DETAINEE DATA

Countries of Origin (Year)
Albania (China) Brazil Pakistan Nigeria
2017
Albania (China) Nigeria Pakistan
2014
Number of Asylum Seekers Placed in Immigration Detention (Year)
0
2020
414
2018
Total Number of Children Placed in Immigration Detention (Year)
0
2017

DETENTION CAPACITY

Immigration Detention Capacity (Specialised Immigration Facilities Only)
0
2018
0
2017
Number of Dedicated Immigration Detention Centres
0
2018
0
2017

ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION

ADDITIONAL ENFORCEMENT DATA

Number of Deportations/Forced Removals (Year)
80
2023
115
2022
160
2018
140
2017
425
2016
250
2015
Number of Voluntary Returns & Deportations (Year)
290
2023
205
2022
165
2021
333
2020
533
2019
365
2018
315
2017
585
2016
365
2015
345
2014
635
2013
745
2012
Percentage of Removals v. Total Removal Orders (Year)
35.6
2014
Number of People Refused Entry (Year)
7,405
2023
9,240
2022
3,725
2021
2,790
2020
7,455
2019
4,795
2018
3,745
2017
3,950
2016
3,450
2015
2,475
2014
Number of Apprehensions of Non-Citizens (Year)
1,485
2023
1,240
2022
545
2021
1,110
2020
2,790
2019
2,045
2018
2,775
2017
2,315
2016
2,315
2015
900
2014
1,465
2013
2,035
2012

PRISON DATA

Criminal Prison Population (Year)
3,777
2017
4,010
2014
Percentage of Foreign Prisoners (Year)
13.3
2017
14.3
2014
Prison Population Rate (per 100,000 of National Population)
81
2017
87
2014

POPULATION DATA

Population (Year)
5,100,000
2023
4,900,000
2020
4,811,321
2017
4,688,000
2015
4,600,000
2012
International Migrants (Year)
871,256
2020
833,564
2019
807,000
2017
746,300
2015
735,500
2013
731,000
2010
International Migrants as Percentage of Population (Year)
17.64
2020
16.9
2017
15.9
2015
15.9
2013
Refugees (Year)
99,048
2023
81,256
2022
9,571
2021
9,035
2020
7,795
2019
6,041
2018
6,405
2017
5,655
2016
6,125
2015
5,853
2014
Ratio of Refugees Per 1000 Inhabitants (Year)
1.22
2016
1.25
2014
1.42
2012
Asylum Applications (Year)
17,487
2023
15,108
2022
6,583
2019
4,014
2016
1,448
2014
2,256
2012
Refugee Recognition Rate (Year)
31
2022
16.6
2014
Stateless Persons (Year)
7
2023
21
2022
99
2018
99
2017
99
2016
0
2015
73
2014

SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA & POLLS

Gross Domestic Product per Capita (in USD)
54,374
2014
47,400
2013
45,932
2012
Remittances to the Country (in USD)
801
2014
626
2011
Remittances From the Country (in USD)
1,751
2010
Unemployment Rate
2014
2009
Net Official Development Assistance (ODA) (in Millions USD)
808
2012
914
2011
Human Development Index Ranking (UNDP)
6 (Very high)
2015
11 (Very high)
2014
7 (Very high)
2012
Integration Index Score
17
2011
World Bank Rule of Law Index
94
2012
97
2011
96
2010

LEGAL & REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

Does the Country Detain People for Migration, Asylum, or Citizenship Reasons?
Infrequently
2023
Does the Country Have Specific Laws that Provide for Migration-Related Detention?
Yes
2023
Detention-Related Legislation
Immigration Act, 1999 (1999)
1999
Immigration Act 2003 (2003)
2003
Immigration Act 2004 (2004)
2004
International Protection Act 2015 (2015)
2015
Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000 (2000)
2000
The International Protection Act 2015 (2015)
2015
Do Migration Detainees Have Constitutional Guarantees?
Yes (Constitution of Ireland, Article 40(4) (habeas corpus)) 1937 2018
1937
Additional Legislation
S.I. No. 230/2018 - European Communities (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2018 (2018)
2018
S.I. No. 62/2018 - European Union (Dublin System) Regulations 2018 (2018)
2018
S.I. No. 55/2005 - Immigration Act 1999 (Deportation) Regulations 2005 (2005)
2005
S.I. No. 56/2005 - Immigration Act 2003 (Removal Places of Detention) Regulations 2005 (2005)
2005
S.I. No. 666/2016 - International Protection Act 2015 (Places of Detention) Regulations 2016 (2016)
2016
S.I. No. 664/2016 - International Protection Act 2015 (Permission to Remain) Regulations 2016 (2016)
2016
S.I. No. 665/2016 - International Protection Act 2015 (Voluntary Return) Regulations 2016 (2016)
2016
S.I. No. 660/2016 - International Protection Act 2015 (Application for International Protection Form) Regulations 2016 (2016)
2016
Bilateral/Multilateral Readmission Agreements
Bulgaria (2003)
2017
Romania (2001)
2017
Cape Verde (EU agreement) (2013)
2013
Georgia (EU agreement) (2011)
2011
Pakistan (EU agreement) (2010)
2010
Bosnia-Herzegovina (EU agreement) (2008)
2008
Macedonia (EU agreement) (2008)
2008
Moldova (EU agreement) (2008)
2008
Montenegro (EU agreement) (2008)
2008
Serbia (EU agreement) (2008)
2008
Ukraine (EU agreement) (2008)
2008
Russia (EU agreement) (2007)
2007
Albania (EU agreement) (2006)
2006
Sri Lanka (EU agreement) (2005)
2005
Hong Kong (EU agreement) (2004)
2004
Macao (EU agreement) (2004)
2004
Nigeria (2001)
2001
Legal Tradition(s)
Common law
2017

GROUNDS FOR DETENTION

Immigration-Status-Related Grounds
Detention for unauthorised entry or stay
2016
Detention to effect removal
2016
Detention to prevent absconding
2016
Detention to ensure transfer under the Dublin Regulation
2016
Detention for unauthorized stay resulting from criminal conviction
2015
Detention to establish/verify identity and nationality
2015
Criminal Penalties for Immigration-Related Violations
Yes (Yes)
2014
Grounds for Criminal Immigration-Related Incarceration / Maximum Length of Incarceration
Unauthorized entry (365)
2014
Unauthorised stay (365)
2014
Children & Other Vulnerable Groups
Unaccompanied minors (Prohibited) No
2021
Asylum seekers (Provided)
2016
Women Yes
2016

LENGTH OF DETENTION

Maximum Length of Administrative Immigration Detention
Number of Days: 56
2018
Average Length of Immigration Detention
2021
Maximum Length of Detention of Asylum-Seekers
No Limit
2018

DETENTION INSTITUTIONS

Custodial Authorities
Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (Department of Justice, Equality, and Law Reform) Justice
2013
Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (Department of Justice, Equality, and Law Reform) Justice
2007
Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (Department of Justice, Equality, and Law Reform) Justice
2005
Detention Facility Management
Irish Prison Service (Governmental)
2013
Irish Prison Service (Governmental)
2007
Irish Prison Service (Governmental)
2005

PROCEDURAL STANDARDS & SAFEGUARDS

Procedural Standards
Independent review of detention (Yes) Yes
2021
Right to legal counsel (Yes) Yes
2021
Information to detainees (Yes) infrequently
2021
Right to appeal the lawfulness of detention (Yes)
2018
Types of Non-Custodial Measures (ATDs) Provided in Law
Supervised release and/or reporting (Yes) No
2021
Designated non-secure housing (Yes) No
2021
Registration (deposit of documents) (Yes)
2015
Electronic monitoring (No) No
2015
Designated non-secure housing (Yes) infrequently
2014
Supervised release and/or reporting (Yes) Yes
2014
Registration (deposit of documents) (Yes) infrequently
2014
Release on bail (Yes) No
2014
Access to Detainees
Lawyer: Yes
Family Members: Yes
NGOs: Yes
International Monitors: Yes
Consular Representatives: Unknown
2021

COSTS & OUTSOURCING

Annual Budgets for Specific Detention Operations
Chartered deportation flights (910,322)
2011
Chartered deportation flights (934,614)
2010
Chartered deportation flights (1,175,782)
2009
Chartered deportation flights (997,000)
2008
Chartered deportation flights (307,000)
2007

COVID-19 DATA

TRANSPARENCY

MONITORING

Types of Authorised Detention Monitoring Institutions
European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) (International or Regional Bodies (IRBs))
2023
Jesuit Refugee Service (Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO))
2023
Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (IHREC) (National Human Rights Institution (or Ombudsperson) (NHRI))
2023
European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) (International or Regional Bodies (IRBs))
2016
Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (IHREC) (National Human Rights Institution (or Ombudsperson) (NHRI))
2016

NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS MONITORING BODIES

NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISMS (OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO UN CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE)

NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS (NGOs)

Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) that Carry Out Detention Monitoring Visits
Yes (Jesuit Refugee Service)
2023
Do NGOs publish reports on immigration detention?
Yes
2023

GOVERNMENTAL MONITORING BODIES

INTERNATIONAL DETENTION MONITORING

International Monitoring Bodies that Carry Out Detention Monitoring Visits
2014

INTERNATIONAL TREATIES & TREATY BODIES

International Treaties Ratified
Ratification Year
Observation Date
OP CRC Communications Procedure
2014
2018
CRPD, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
2018
2018
CTOCTP, Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children
2010
2010
CAT, Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
2002
2002
ICERD, International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
2000
2000
CRC, Convention on the Rights of the Child
1992
1992
ICCPR, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
1989
1989
ICESCR, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
1989
1989
CEDAW, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
1985
1985
PCRSR, Protocol to the Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees
1968
1968
VCCR, Vienna Convention on Consular Relations
1967
1967
CRSSP, Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons
1962
1962
CRSR, Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees
1956
1956
Ratio of relevant international treaties ratified
Ratio: 13/19
Treaty Reservations
Reservation Year
Observation Date
ICCPR Article 10 1989
1989
1989
ICESCR Article 2 1989
1989
1989
ICESCR Article 13 1989
1989
1989
Individual Complaints Procedures
Acceptance Year
CAT, declaration under article 22 of the Convention 2002
2002
ICERD, declaration under article 14 of the Convention 2000
2000
CEDAW, Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, 1999 2000
2000
ICCPR, First Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 1989
1989
Ratio of Complaints Procedures Accepted
Observation Date
4 / 6
4 / 6
Relevant Recommendations or Observations Issued by Treaty Bodies
Recommendation Year
Observation Date
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination § 36. The State party: (a) Expedite the processing of applications with a view to delivering the decision within six months; (b) Implement the Data and Research Strategy 2018–2020 of the Department of Justice and Equality, and collect and report quantitative and qualitative data on refugees, beneficiaries of international protection, asylum seekers and stateless persons; (c) Introduce a comprehensive vulnerability assessment mechanism for early identification of asylum seekers with special needs; (d) Establish a procedure for the determination of statelessness; (e) Reduce the waiting period before a person is eligible to work; (f) Remove barriers in obtaining a job, including by providing transport, and employment and training services. 2020
2020
Committee on the Rights of the Child § 7. "The Committee recommends that the State party take all necessary measures to address its previous recommendations of 2006 (CRC/C/IRL/CO/2) that have not been sufficiently implemented, in particular, those related to legislation and implementation, independent monitoring, children with disabilities, health and health-care services, adolescent health, standard of living, refugee and asylum-seeking children, administration of juvenile justice, and children belonging to minorities... 20. In the light of its general comment No. 2 (2002) on the role of independent human rights institutions in the promotion and protection of the rights of the child, the Committee recommends that the State party ensure the independence of the Ombudsman for Children’s Office, including with regard to its funding and mandate so as to ensure full compliance with the Paris Principles. In doing so, the State party should further consider ways and means to directly provide the Office with financial resources rather than through the Department of Children and Youth Affairs. Furthermore, the Committee recommends that the State party consider amending the provisions of the Ombudsman for Children Act, 2002, which preclude the Ombudsman for Children’s Office from investigating complaints from children in a refugee, asylum-seeking and/or irregular migration situation... 66. In the light of its general comment No. 6 (2005) on treatment of unaccompanied and separated children outside their country of origin, the Committee recommends that the State party take the necessary measures to bring its asylum and refugee policy, procedures and practice into line with its international obligations, as well as principles outlined in other documents, including the Statement of Good Practices produced by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Furthermore, the Committee recommends that the State party strengthen its measures to ensure that children in an asylum-seeking or refugee situation are ensured the same standards of and access to support services as Irish children. The Committee urges the State party to ensure independent inspections of all refugee accommodation centres. Furthermore, the Committee recommends that the State party take measures to ensure that asylum and refugee accommodation centres have: (a) Facilities, including recreation areas, that are appropriate for young children and families; (b) Adequate child protection services, education for children and appropriate clothing and food for children, including food that is of adequate quality and culturally appropriate for children of minority faiths; these centres should also address the needs of children with dietary requirements and, to the extent possible, allow for residents to store and cook their own food; (c) Proportionately increase the child allowance provided to asylum seekers to ensure that it correlates with the cost of living in the State party... 68. Emphasizing that all children are entitled to the full protection and implementation of their rights under the Convention, the Committee urges the State party to ensure that the rights enshrined in the Convention are guaranteed for all children under the State party’s jurisdiction, regardless of their migration status or that of their parents, and to address all violations of those rights. In particular, the Committee urges the State party to: (a) Expeditiously adopt a comprehensive legal framework that is in accordance with international human rights standards to address the needs of migrant children in the State party; (b) Ensure that the said legal framework includes clear and accessible formal procedures for conferring immigration status on children and their families who are in irregular migration situations; (c) Take measures to ensure that children in irregular migration situations are provided with independent legal advice and timely clarifications on their migration status." 2016
2016
Human Rights Committee § 17. The State party should review its detention policy with regard to asylum-seekers and give priority to alternative forms of accommodation. The State party should take immediate and effective measures to ensure that all persons detained for immigration-related reasons are held in facilities specifically designed for this purpose. The State party should also ensure that the principle of the best interests of the child is given due consideration in all decisions concerning unaccompanied and separated children and that social services, such as the Health Service Executive, are involved in the age assessment of asylum-seekers by immigration officials. 2008
2008

> UN Special Procedures

> UN Universal Periodic Review

Relevant Recommendations or Observations from the UN Universal Periodic Review
Observation Date
Yes 2011
2017
Yes 2016
2017

> Global Compact for Migration (GCM)

GCM Resolution Endorsement
Observation Date
2018

> Global Compact on Refugees (GCR)

GCR Resolution Endorsement
Observation Date
2018

REGIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS MECHANISMS

Regional Legal Instruments
Year of Ratification (Treaty) / Transposed (Directive) / Adoption (Regulation)
Observation Date
ECHR, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (commonly known as the European Convention on Human Rights 1953
1953
2017
ECHRP1, Protocol 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights (amended by protocol 11) 1953
1953
2017
ECHRP7, Protocol 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights (amended by protocol 11) 2001
2001
2017
ECPT, European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment 1988
1988
2017
CATHB, Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings 2010
2010
2017
Procedures Directive 2011
2011
Regional Treaty Reservations
Reservation Year
Observation Date
ECHR Article 6 1953
1953
1953
ECHRP1Article 2 1953
1953
1953
Relevant Recommendations or Observations of Regional Human Rights Mechanisms
Recommendation Year
Observation Date
European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) § 26: The Irish authorities to put in place a specifically designed centre for immigration detainees in accordance with the Committee’s requirements. Further, it wishes to receive information on the conditions and regime afforded to immigration detainees pending the opening of such a unit. § 65: The Irish authorities, at Cloverhill Prison, a programme of ongoing maintenance and refurbishment be undertaken and that efforts progressively be made to ensure that cells of 11m² (including the sanitary facility) accommodate no more than two prisoners. Further, toilets in multiple-occupancy cells should be fully partitioned up to the ceiling. § 66: Steps be taken to ensure that prisoners do not have to sleep on a mattress on the floor and that they are provided with their own bed. Moreover, specifically vulnerable prisoners should never have to sleep on a mattress on the floor. 2019
2019
Global Detention Project and Partner Submissions to Regional Human Rights Bodies
Date of Submission
Observation Date
2019 https://www.globaldetentionproject.org/submission-to-the-european-committee-for-the-prevention-of-torture-cpt Global Detention Project European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) Suggestions: The CPT may wish to verify whether all nine prisons continue to be used for immigration purposes and the extent to which police stations are used. How are non-citizens separated from people detained under criminal law in these facilities? How is their status as administrative detainees upheld? And can the country provide statistics on the numbers of immigration detainees placed in all facilities—prisons and police stations—or does it fail to keep such statistics? Pending
2019
2019

HEALTH CARE PROVISION

HEALTH IMPACTS

COVID-19

Country Updates
In late November, the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture released a report about its monitoring visit to Ireland in 2019. In the report, the committee reiterates its long-standing calls for Irish authorities to cease the use of prisons for immigration detention, noting that “a prison is by definition not a suitable place in which to detain someone who is neither suspected nor convicted of a criminal offence.” The committee reports that it met with several immigration detainees who had experienced bullying and abuse from other prisoners. It pointed, for example, to the case of a “middle-aged diminutive foreign national was placed in a cell with two young remand prisoners who allegedly attempted to rape him as well as physically aggressed and verbally intimidated him.” In the GDP’s most recent country profile on Ireland, published in August 2019, we reported that a dedicated detention facility was slated to open at Dublin Airport in late 2019. The profile noted concerns that such a facility could lead to more detention in the country. Media reports indicate that as of August 2020, this facility had yet to open. The CPT, however, reports that by the time of its visit to Ireland in September-October 2019, a new Garda (Police) Station had opened at the airport (with four cells and two holding rooms), which could detain non-citizens for a maximum of 24 hours. Prisons, however, continue to detain immigration detainees for longer periods. As a result, the CPT reiterated its call, which it has been repeating since at least 2006, for authorities to establish a dedicated immigration detention facility. The CPT suggested the use of a disused unit at Cloverhill Prison (F Block) where detainees could be offered a more open regime, and greater access to the telephone and unscreened visits. The latest CPT report on Ireland arrived at a time of increased concern about the spread of COVID-19 in prisons that are used to hold immigraiotn detainees. In Cloverhill Prison, three inmates are known to have contracted the virus, while five prisoners in Midlands Prison were reported to have tested positive as of 30 October. Both the Cloverhill and Midlands prisons are used to confine migrants and asylum seekers. During the pandemic, the country’s Refugee Protection Programme--a scheme designed to relocate up to 2,900 refugees to the country via resettlement and community sponsorship between 2020 and 2023--was temporarily suspended due to travel restrictions. However, the suspension in Ireland appears to have been lifted, with several groups of refugees reported to have been flown to the country since the summer. Most recently on 19 November, 160 Syrians (including 90 children) were transported to Ireland on an IOM chartered flight. (Ireland has not been alone in the suspension of its resettlement scheme: on 19 November, UNHCR warned that 2020 will be a record low for resettlement. According to the agency’s data, 15,425 persons were resettled worldwide between January and the end of October, compared to 50,086 during the same period in 2019.)
In an email exchange with the Global Detention Project, UNHCR Ireland reported that to their knowledge, deportations and removals had been suspended in light of the Covid-19 crisis. The International Protection Office was still functioning throughout the pandemic and applications were being accepted. However, the number of new applicants had decreased because of fewer arrivals. Applications for international protection at the borders and airports were also being accepted. In responding to the Global Detention Project’s Covid-19 survey, NASC, the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre, reported that Ireland had not established a moratorium on new immigration detention orders and no immigration detainees had been released due to the pandemic. Moreover, according to NASC, immigration detainees are not treated separately to the general prison population (see also the 25 March Ireland update on this platform). Visits to prisons were restricted and new staffing routines were put in place. No Covid-19 cases have been reported among the prison population in Ireland for the time being. NASC confirmed that deportations and removals had been suspended due to the pandemic and that there had been an increase in the number of persons denied entry at the border. All immigration permits that were due to expire from 20 March to 20 July, were automatically renewed for a period of two months and those expiring from 20 July to 20 August, were extended for one month (see 16 April Ireland update on this platform). This is due to the fact that no visa applications were processed or issued, save for certain priority categories from 20 March to 20 July. Designated centres were put in place to allow asylum seekers to self-isolate if diagnosed with the virus (see the 29 April Ireland update on this platform). There were a certain number of outbreaks in some asylum seekers accommodation centres, and these centres were completely locked down to control the spread of the disease.
The Ombudsman’s Annual Report on Direct Provision asylum centres, published on 23 April, says that the Covid-19 crisis has underscored how “unsuitable and unsustainable” the physical constraints at these centres are, in particular because of the lack of overall space in the facilities and their lack of resources. The standards provide “a minimum space of 4.65m² for each resident per bedroom.” This represents “little more than the floor space taken up by a double bed and it includes any storage units a person might have.’’ On 23 April, the Department of Justice announced that people at these facilities who are suspected of having the virus are to be moved to a dedicated offsite self-isolation facility. More than 100 asylum seekers were transferred to a new asylum reception site in Cahersiveen in late March. It was placed on lockdown shortly after when several residents tested positive for Covid-19. On 29 April, 21 cases of Covid-19 were reported at this Direct Provision centre, according to an asylum seeker staying there. Around 90 residents remain in the centre and some are sharing rooms as. A protest was organised by the asylum seekers outside the centre. Local politicians have called on the Department of Justice to shut the centre down. Residents are concerned for their safety. Members of the local community have also called for the closure of the centre. Asylum seekers who test positive to Covid-19 are transferred to a new accommodation in Cork. As part of the government’s measures to combat the coronavirus outbreak, any information gathered about undocumented migrants during the COVID-19 crisis remains secret. This “firewall” between the Department of Health and the Department of Justice and Equality allows migrants to access medical treatment without risking an enforcement action. According to Niel Burton of Migrant Rights Centre Ireland, as of late April all residents in Ireland can receive a “Pandemic Payment” designed to support the population. However, he said that while this measure is necessary, it isn’t perfect in its application. Bruton, who spoked on the Webinar organized by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) on 23 April, stated that ‘’A lot of undocumented migrants are afraid to put down the employer’s details on the application, or do not have a bank account.’’ Interviews and hearings for international protection application have been suspended until further notice. Assisted voluntary returns are not being processed now, and deportation orders have been postponed. This delay concerns all persons subject of deportation, removal or transfer orders that are due for presentation in the coming four to six weeks.
A hotel that was converted to a “direct provision” asylum reception site in the town of Cahersiveen has been placed under lockdown after several residents tested positive for Covid-19. More than one hundred asylum seekers were transferred four weeks ago to the hotel to await the outcomes of their asylum procedures. All the residents have been confined to the hotel since 19 April. An asylum-seeker at the Cahersiveen Direct Provision center spoke to RTÉ Ireland, claiming that he was concerned about his safety. He mentioned that ‘’Residents are being asked to wear a mask when they leave their rooms, but they are being given just one mask each day and must reuse it every time they leave their room.’’ The residents share many areas such as the lifts, dining room and stairs and while they are allowed to eat in their bedroom, they must collect their meals themselves at the dining room. The facility has sparked public opposition driven in part by concern that the government may have placed people in the facility who were previously exposed to the vires. The Department of Justice responded saying that they had implemented a range of measures in all direct provision centres to address cases of Covid-19, including the provision of self-isolation facilities and offsite isolation centres."If the concerns locally are that the people may have recently arrived from a region affected by Covid-19, I can confirm that no one in the group of 105 has been in this country for less than two months and all have been health screened by the HSE-led medical team at our reception centre in Baleseskin, North Dublin on their arrival," a spokesperson for the Department said.
The Irish Department of Justice and Equality announced that all immigration permits due to expire between 20.03.2020 and 20.05.2020 are to be automatically renewed for a period of two months. In addition, the Department of Employment Affairs and Social Protection introduced a Covid-19 Pandemic Unemployment Payment, accessible to all workers irrespective of legal status. The Department also confirmed that “there are no plans in place to share any data [received] as part of an immigrant’s application for a Covid-19 Unemployment Payment with the National Immigration Bureau (GNID) or the Department of Justice and Equality.
Ireland does not have specialized immigraiotn detention centres, instead using prisons and jails to detain people for immigration reasons. In Irish prisons, the prison administration announced on 13 March 2020 restrictions regarding visits. Visits are only allowed for 15 minutes, once a week and per prisoner. Visitors under the age of 18 and those that have flu symptoms will not be allowed to enter. Also, the Irish Prison Service has been considering the release of certain prisoners to prevent the spread of Covid-19. On 20 March 2020, the Department of Justice announced that foreign nationals with visas due to expire in the coming weeks, will be able to remain in Ireland until at least 20 May 2020. In addition, Migrants Rights Centre Ireland has reported that the Irish government confirmed that documented or undocumented persons can access healthcare and social welfare services. These services will not share people’s information with the Department of Justice and Equality. Refugee support groups have warned of a “potentially devastating impact” of an outbreak of Covid-19 in the 39 direct provision centres, that currently house 5,686 people including 1,739 children. Fiona Finn, the chief executive of the Migrant and Refugee Rights Centre said: “there are people who are immune-compromised or in other high-risk categories who are sharing rooms with strangers. Being able to take even the minimum precautions of regularly washing your hands with warm water and soap in these conditions can be challenging.” The organisation is also calling on the Minister for Justice to “move the vulnerable out” to avoid the spread of Covid-19.
Did the country release immigration detainees as a result of the pandemic?
No
2020
Did the country use legal "alternatives to detention" as part of pandemic detention releases?
Unknown
2021
Did the country Temporarily Cease or Restrict Issuing Detention Orders?
No
2020
Did the Country Adopt These Pandemic-Related Measures for People in Immigration Detention?
Yes (Unknown) Unknown Unknown Yes
2021
Did the Country Lock-Down Previously "Open" Reception Facilities, Shelters, Refugee Camps, or Other Forms of Accommodation for Migrant Workers or Other Non-Citizens?
Yes but have reopened
2020
Were cases of COVID-19 reported in immigration detention facilities or any other places used for immigration detention purposes?
Yes
2021
Did the Country Cease or Restrict Deportations/Removals During any Period After the Onset of the Pandemic?
Yes but restrictons ended
2021
Did the Country Release People from Criminal Prisons During the Pandemic?
Yes
2020
Did Officials Blame Migrants, Asylum Seekers, or Refugees for the Spread of COVID-19?
Unknown
2021
Did the Country Restrict Access to Asylum Procedures?
Yes but restrictons ended
2020
Did the Country Commence a National Vaccination Campaign?
Yes
2021
Were Populations of Concern Included/Excluded From the National Vaccination Campaign?
Included (Partially Included) Included Included Unknown
2021